Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31510937›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2019

Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying graft success in grapevine.

M Assunção, C Santos, J Brazão, J E Eiras-Dias, P Fevereiro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Pear Scab Disease Suppression byPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M AssunçãoPlant Cell Biotechnology Laboratory, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier (Green-it Unit), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Apartado 127, 2781-901, Oeiras, Portugal. massuncao@itqb.unl.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3143-7427
C SantosGenetics and Genomics of Plant Complex Traits (PlantX) Laboratory, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier (Green-it Unit), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Apartado 127, 2781-901, Oeiras, Portugal.
J BrazãoInstituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária (Biotechnology and Genetic Genetic Resources Unit) INIAV-Dois Portos, Quinta da Almoínha, 2565-191, Dois Portos, Portugal.
J E Eiras-DiasInstituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária (Biotechnology and Genetic Genetic Resources Unit) INIAV-Dois Portos, Quinta da Almoínha, 2565-191, Dois Portos, Portugal.
P FevereiroPlant Cell Biotechnology Laboratory, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier (Green-it Unit), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Apartado 127, 2781-901, Oeiras, Portugal.
Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária · PTUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PD/00035/2013Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PD/BD/113476/2015Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PTDC/AGR-PRO/118081/2010Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UID/Multi/04551/2013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGrafting is an intensive commercial practice required to protect the European grapevine against the Phylloxera pest. Rootstocks resistant to this pest are hybrids of American vine species with different levels of compatibility with European Vitis vinifera varieties. Aiming to understand what drives grafting compatibility in grapevine, a transcriptomic approach was used to search for master regulators of graft success. Two scion/rootstock combinations, with different levels of compatibility, were compared in a nursery-grafting context at two stages, at 21 and 80 days after grafting.

resultsIn the most compatible combination, an earlier and higher expression of genes signaling the metabolic and hormonal pathways as well as a reduced expression of genes of the phenolic metabolism and of the oxidative stress response was observed. At 80 days after grafting a higher expression of transcription factors regulating vascular maintenance, differentiation and proliferation was obtained in the most compatible combination. Moreover, lower expression levels of microRNAs potentially targeting important transcription factors related to plant development was observed in the more compatible combination when compared to the less compatible one.

conclusionIn this context, a set of regulators was selected as potential expression markers for early prediction of a compatible grafting.

Indexed as

AgricultureGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantTranscriptomeVitisGraft compatibilityGraftingGrapevineMolecular mechanism of graftingPost-transcriptional regulation of graftingTranscriptional regulation of graftingVascular differentiation

Identifiers

PMID31510937
PMCPMC6737599
OpenAlexW2972859288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.