Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31510916›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

Deciphering epigenomic code for cell differentiation using deep learning.

Pengyu Ni, Zhengchang Su

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pengyu NiDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genomics, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA.
Zhengchang SuDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genomics, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA. zcsu@uncc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Charlotte · US

Funding

Understanding the complexity of the transcriptomes in E. coli K12R01GM106013 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE · PI SU, ZHENGCHANG · 2014 to 2017
$1.1M
National Science Foundation 1661332NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM106013NIH HHS R01GM106013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough DNA sequence plays a crucial role in establishing the unique epigenome of a cell type, little is known about the sequence determinants that lead to the unique epigenomes of different cell types produced during cell differentiation. To fill this gap, we employed two types of deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) constructed for each of differentially related cell types and for each of histone marks measured in the cells, to learn the sequence determinants of various histone modification patterns in each cell type.

resultsWe applied our models to four differentially related human CD

conclusionSequence determinants of various histone modification patterns in different cell types can be revealed by comparative analysis of motifs learned in the CNN models for multiple cell types and histone marks. The learned motifs are interpretable and may provide insights into the underlying molecular mechanisms of establishing the unique epigenomes in different cell types. Thus, our results support the hypothesis that DNA sequences ultimately determine the unique epigenomes of different cell types through their interactions with transcriptional factors, epigenome remodeling system and extracellular cues during cell differentiation.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEpigenomicsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCell DifferentiationCell LineageConserved SequenceHistone CodeHumansNucleotide MotifsDeep learningHistone modificationT cell differentiation

Identifiers

PMID31510916
PMCPMC6739944
OpenAlexW2973145183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.