Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31510904›Full record

ReviewStroke2019

Advances and Innovations in Aphasia Treatment Trials.

Shauna Berube, Argye E Hillis

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stroke, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Diagnosing and managing post-stroke aphasia.Expert review of neurotherapeutics · 2021
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Treatment of post-stroke aphasia: A narrative review for stroke neurologists.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Developments in treating the nonmotor symptoms of stroke.Expert review of neurotherapeutics · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shauna BerubeFrom the Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Argye E HillisFrom the Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Telerehab for Aphasia (TERRA)P50DC014664 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI HICKOK, GREGORY · 2016 to 2025
$25.0M
Neural Basis of Lexical Deficits in Hyperacute StrokeR01DC005375 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Argye E. Hillis · 2002 to 2026
$11.8M
The Neural Basis of Impaired Affective Prosody in Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal DegenerationR01DC015466 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HILLIS, ARGYE E. · 2017 to 2021
$3.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC014664NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005375NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicAphasiaHumansStrokeaphasialanguagetranscranial direct current stimulationtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID31510904
PMCPMC6756955
OpenAlexW2972708008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.