Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31510654›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019

PRECISE: a domain adaptation approach to transfer predictors of drug response from pre-clinical models to tumors.

Soufiane Mourragui, Marco Loog, Mark A van de Wiel, Marcel J T Reinders, Lodewyk F A Wessels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. SpaGene: A Deep Adversarial Framework for Spatial Gene Imputation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Article
  9. SpaGene: A Deep Adversarial Framework for Spatial Gene Imputation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Soufiane MourraguiComputational Cancer Biology, Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam CX, The Netherlands.
Marco LoogDepartment of Intelligent Systems, Faculty of EEMCS, Delft University of Technology, Delft CD, The Netherlands.
Mark A van de WielDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marcel J T ReindersDepartment of Intelligent Systems, Faculty of EEMCS, Delft University of Technology, Delft CD, The Netherlands.
Lodewyk F A WesselsComputational Cancer Biology, Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam CX, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationCell lines and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) have been used extensively to understand the molecular underpinnings of cancer. While core biological processes are typically conserved, these models also show important differences compared to human tumors, hampering the translation of findings from pre-clinical models to the human setting. In particular, employing drug response predictors generated on data derived from pre-clinical models to predict patient response remains a challenging task. As very large drug response datasets have been collected for pre-clinical models, and patient drug response data are often lacking, there is an urgent need for methods that efficiently transfer drug response predictors from pre-clinical models to the human setting.

resultsWe show that cell lines and PDXs share common characteristics and processes with human tumors. We quantify this similarity and show that a regression model cannot simply be trained on cell lines or PDXs and then applied on tumors. We developed PRECISE, a novel methodology based on domain adaptation that captures the common information shared amongst pre-clinical models and human tumors in a consensus representation. Employing this representation, we train predictors of drug response on pre-clinical data and apply these predictors to stratify human tumors. We show that the resulting domain-invariant predictors show a small reduction in predictive performance in the pre-clinical domain but, importantly, reliably recover known associations between independent biomarkers and their companion drugs on human tumors. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: PRECISE and the scripts for running our experiments are available on our GitHub page (https://github.com/NKI-CCB/PRECISE). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsAnimalsBiological PhenomenaDisease Models, AnimalForecastingHumansSoftwareAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID31510654
PMCPMC6612899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.