ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019
Fully-sensitive seed finding in sequence graphs using a hybrid index.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A survey of sequence-to-graph mapping algorithms in the pangenome era.Genome biology · 2025Review
- GIN-TONIC: non-hierarchical full-text indexing for graph genomes.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Aligning distant sequences to graphs using long seed sketches.Genome research · 2023Article
- Review
- Population-scale genotyping of structural variation in the era of long-read sequencing.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- Pangenomics enables genotyping of known structural variants in 5202 diverse genomes.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- A variant selection framework for genome graphs.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Demonstrating the utility of flexible sequence queries against indexed short reads with FlexTyper.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- GraphAligner: rapid and versatile sequence-to-graph alignment.Genome biology · 2020Article
- Pangenome Graphs.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2020Review
- CHOP: haplotype-aware path indexing in population graphs.Genome biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationSequence graphs are versatile data structures that are, for instance, able to represent the genetic variation found in a population and to facilitate genome assembly. Read mapping to sequence graphs constitutes an important step for many applications and is usually done by first finding exact seed matches, which are then extended by alignment. Existing methods for finding seed hits prune the graph in complex regions, leading to a loss of information especially in highly polymorphic regions of the genome. While such complex graph structures can indeed lead to a combinatorial explosion of possible alleles, the query set of reads from a diploid individual realizes only two alleles per locus-a property that is not exploited by extant methods.
resultsWe present the Pan-genome Seed Index (PSI), a fully-sensitive hybrid method for seed finding, which takes full advantage of this property by combining an index over selected paths in the graph with an index over the query reads. This enables PSI to find all seeds while eliminating the need to prune the graph. We demonstrate its performance with different parameter settings on both simulated data and on a whole human genome graph constructed from variants in the 1000 Genome Project dataset. On this graph, PSI outperforms GCSA2 in terms of index size, query time and sensitivity. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The C++ implementation is publicly available at: https://github.com/cartoonist/psi.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.