ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019
Minnow: a principled framework for rapid simulation of dscRNA-seq data at the read level.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- A realistic FastQ-based framework FastQDesign for ScRNA-seq study design issues.Communications biology · 2025Article
- AsaruSim: a single-cell and spatial RNA-Seq Nanopore long-reads simulation workflow.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- The impact of ambient contamination on demultiplexing methods for single-nucleus multiome experiments.Research square · 2025Article
- The impact of ambient contamination on demultiplexing methods for single-nucleus multiome experiments.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- DifferentialRegulation: a Bayesian hierarchical approach to identify differentially regulated genes.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- DifferentialRegulation: a Bayesian hierarchical approach to identify differentially regulated genes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- scReadSim: a single-cell RNA-seq and ATAC-seq read simulator.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Navigating bottlenecks and trade-offs in genomic data analysis.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2023Review
- SoloTE for improved analysis of transposable elements in single-cell RNA-Seq data using locus-specific expression.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Fast and accurate matching of cellular barcodes across short-reads and long-reads of single-cell RNA-seq experiments.iScience · 2022Article
- PathogenTrack and Yeskit: tools for identifying intracellular pathogens from single-cell RNA-sequencing datasets as illustrated by application to COVID-19.Frontiers of medicine · 2022Article
- Compression of quantification uncertainty for scRNA-seq counts.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Simulation, power evaluation and sample size recommendation for single-cell RNA-seq.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Integrated multi-omics approaches to improve classification of chronic kidney disease.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2020Review
- A Bayesian framework for inter-cellular information sharing improves dscRNA-seq quantification.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
summaryWith the advancements of high-throughput single-cell RNA-sequencing protocols, there has been a rapid increase in the tools available to perform an array of analyses on the gene expression data that results from such studies. For example, there exist methods for pseudo-time series analysis, differential cell usage, cell-type detection RNA-velocity in single cells, etc. Most analysis pipelines validate their results using known marker genes (which are not widely available for all types of analysis) and by using simulated data from gene-count-level simulators. Typically, the impact of using different read-alignment or unique molecular identifier (UMI) deduplication methods has not been widely explored. Assessments based on simulation tend to start at the level of assuming a simulated count matrix, ignoring the effect that different approaches for resolving UMI counts from the raw read data may produce. Here, we present minnow, a comprehensive sequence-level droplet-based single-cell RNA-sequencing (dscRNA-seq) experiment simulation framework. Minnow accounts for important sequence-level characteristics of experimental scRNA-seq datasets and models effects such as polymerase chain reaction amplification, cellular barcodes (CB) and UMI selection and sequence fragmentation and sequencing. It also closely matches the gene-level ambiguity characteristics that are observed in real scRNA-seq experiments. Using minnow, we explore the performance of some common processing pipelines to produce gene-by-cell count matrices from droplet-bases scRNA-seq data, demonstrate the effect that realistic levels of gene-level sequence ambiguity can have on accurate quantification and show a typical use-case of minnow in assessing the output generated by different quantification pipelines on the simulated experiment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.