Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31510648›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019

Controlling large Boolean networks with single-step perturbations.

Alexis Baudin, Soumya Paul, Cui Su, Jun Pang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexis BaudinDepartment of Computer Science, École Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay, Cachan, France.
Soumya PaulFaculty of Science, Technology and Communication, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Cui SuInterdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Jun PangFaculty of Science, Technology and Communication, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThe control of Boolean networks has traditionally focussed on strategies where the perturbations are applied to the nodes of the network for an extended period of time. In this work, we study if and how a Boolean network can be controlled by perturbing a minimal set of nodes for a single-step and letting the system evolve afterwards according to its original dynamics. More precisely, given a Boolean network (BN), we compute a minimal subset Cmin of the nodes such that BN can be driven from any initial state in an attractor to another 'desired' attractor by perturbing some or all of the nodes of Cmin for a single-step. Such kind of control is attractive for biological systems because they are less time consuming than the traditional strategies for control while also being financially more viable. However, due to the phenomenon of state-space explosion, computing such a minimal subset is computationally inefficient and an approach that deals with the entire network in one-go, does not scale well for large networks.

resultsWe develop a 'divide-and-conquer' approach by decomposing the network into smaller partitions, computing the minimal control on the projection of the attractors to these partitions and then composing the results to obtain Cmin for the whole network. We implement our method and test it on various real-life biological networks to demonstrate its applicability and efficiency. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene Regulatory Networks

Identifiers

PMID31510648
PMCPMC6612811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.