ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019
Effects of Microbial Activity and Environmental Parameters on the Degradation of Extracellular Environmental DNA from a Eutrophic Lake.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Effect of fish biomass on environmental DNA shedding and degradation.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
- Ecological Health and Freshwater Pathogen Using eDNA Metabarcoding: A Preliminary Assessment for Environmental Surveillance Development in Malaysia.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- DNA State Influences the Uptake and Persistence of Environmental DNA by Marine Sponge Natural Samplers.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Environmental DNA: Preliminary Characterization of Microbiota in Three Sicilian Lakes.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- The Use of Environmental DNA as Preliminary Description of Invertebrate Diversity in Three Sicilian Lakes.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Potential Role of Photochemistry in Environmental DNA Degradation.Environmental science & technology letters · 2024Review
- Article
- Quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay for the specific detection of the Chinese mystery snail (Cipangopaludina chinensis) in the UK.PloS one · 2023Article
- Why eDNA fractions need consideration in biomonitoring.Molecular ecology resources · 2022Review
- The Multiple States of Environmental DNA and What Is Known about Their Persistence in Aquatic Environments.Environmental science & technology · 2022Review
- Water pre-filtration methods to improve environmental DNA detection by real-time PCR and metabarcoding.PloS one · 2021Article
- Eutrophication and the Ecological Health Risk.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracellular DNA (exDNA) pool in aquatic environments is a valuable source for biomonitoring and bioassessment. However, degradation under particular environmental conditions can hamper exDNA detectability over time. In this study, we analyzed how different biotic and abiotic factors affect the degradation rate of extracellular environmental DNA using 16S rDNA sequences extracted from the sediment of a eutrophic lake and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.