Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31509880›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2019

Pan-European Data Harmonization for Biobanks in ADOPT BBMRI-ERIC.

Sebastian Mate, Marvin Kampf, Wolfgang Rödle, Stefan Kraus, Rumyana Proynova, Kaisa Silander, Lars Ebert, Martin Lablans, Christina Schüttler, Christian Knell and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Understanding the Nature of Metadata: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The Future of Biobanking: What Is Next?Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sebastian MateMedical Centre for Information and Communication Technology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Marvin KampfMedical Centre for Information and Communication Technology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Wolfgang RödleChair of Medical Informatics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Stefan KrausChair of Medical Informatics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Rumyana ProynovaMedical Informatics in Translational Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Kaisa SilanderGenomics and Biobank Unit, Finnish National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Lars EbertFederated Information Systems, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin LablansFederated Information Systems, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christina SchüttlerChair of Medical Informatics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Christian KnellMedical Centre for Information and Communication Technology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Niina EklundGenomics and Biobank Unit, Finnish National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Michael HummelInstitute of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Petr HolubBiobanking and BioMolecular Resources Research Infrastructure (BBMRI-ERIC), Graz, Austria.
Hans-Ulrich ProkoschMedical Centre for Information and Communication Technology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-quality clinical data and biological specimens are key for medical research and personalized medicine. The Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure-European Research Infrastructure Consortium (BBMRI-ERIC) aims to facilitate access to such biological resources. The accompanying ADOPT BBMRI-ERIC project kick-started BBMRI-ERIC by collecting colorectal cancer data from European biobanks.

objectivesTo transform these data into a common representation, a uniform approach for data integration and harmonization had to be developed. This article describes the design and the implementation of a toolset for this task.

methodsBased on the semantics of a metadata repository, we developed a lexical bag-of-words matcher, capable of semiautomatically mapping local biobank terms to the central ADOPT BBMRI-ERIC terminology. Its algorithm supports fuzzy matching, utilization of synonyms, and sentiment tagging. To process the anonymized instance data based on these mappings, we also developed a data transformation application.

resultsThe implementation was used to process the data from 10 European biobanks. The lexical matcher automatically and correctly mapped 78.48% of the 1,492 local biobank terms, and human experts were able to complete the remaining mappings. We used the expert-curated mappings to successfully process 147,608 data records from 3,415 patients.

conclusionA generic harmonization approach was created and successfully used for cross-institutional data harmonization across 10 European biobanks. The software tools were made available as open source.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksColorectal NeoplasmsEuropeHumansReference Standards

Identifiers

PMID31509880
PMCPMC6739205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.