Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31509739›Full record

ArticleCell reports2019

Skeletal Stem Cell-Schwann Cell Circuitry in Mandibular Repair.

R Ellen Jones, Ankit Salhotra, Kiana S Robertson, Ryan C Ransom, Deshka S Foster, Harsh N Shah, Natalina Quarto, Derrick C Wan, Michael T Longaker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neural Orchestration of Mandibular Development.International dental journal · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R Ellen JonesDepartment of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Ankit SalhotraDepartment of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Kiana S RobertsonDepartment of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Ryan C RansomDepartment of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Deshka S FosterDepartment of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Harsh N ShahDepartment of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Natalina QuartoDepartment of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Derrick C WanDepartment of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Michael T LongakerDepartment of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: longaker@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

Center for Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Tissue and Organ Regeneration (C-DOCTOR)U24DE026914 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHAI, YANG, CHEN, YONG · 2017 to 2019
$12.0M
Graduate Training in Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative MedicineT32GM119995 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WEISSMAN, IRVING L. · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
Identifying the human skeletal stem cell.R01DE027323 · NIDCR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LONGAKER, MICHAEL T · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
Cellular and Mechanical Mechanisms Regulating Mandibular Distraction OsteogenesisR01DE026730 · NIDCR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LONGAKER, MICHAEL T · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS--ENDOGENOUS TISSUE ENGINEERINGR01DE013028 · NIDCR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LONGAKER, MICHAEL T · 1998 to 2002
$723k
Defining BMP-responsive lncRNA for bone regenerationK08DE024269 · NIDCR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WAN, DERRICK · 2014 to 2018
$632k
Nikon A1Rsi resonant spectral confocal microscopeS10OD010580 · OD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FULLER, MARGARET T · 2013 to 2013
$377k
NIDCR NIH HHS K08 DE024269NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE013028NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE026730NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE027323NIDCR NIH HHS U24 DE026914NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM119995NIH HHS S10 OD010580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regenerative paradigms exhibit nerve dependency, including regeneration of the mouse digit tip and salamander limb. Denervation impairs regeneration and produces morphological aberrancy in these contexts, but the direct effect of innervation on the stem and progenitor cells enacting these processes is unknown. We devised a model to examine nerve dependency of the mouse skeletal stem cell (mSSC), the progenitor responsible for skeletal development and repair. We show that after inferior alveolar denervation, mandibular bone repair is compromised because of functional defects in mSSCs. We present mSSC reliance on paracrine factors secreted by Schwann cells as the underlying mechanism, with partial rescue of the denervated phenotype by Schwann cell transplantation and by Schwann-derived growth factors. This work sheds light on the nerve dependency of mSSCs and has implications for clinical treatment of mandibular defects.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone RegenerationDenervationIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMandibleMandibular InjuriesMandibular NerveMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeuronsParacrine CommunicationPeripheral Nerve InjuriesPlatelet-Derived Growth FactorSchwann CellsStem CellsWound HealingIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsPlatelet-Derived Growth Factorplatelet-derived growth factor Amandibular repairnerve-dependent mandibular regenerationSchwann cellsskeletal stem cells

Identifiers

PMID31509739
PMCPMC6820052
OpenAlexW2972505478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.