Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31509608›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2020

Unmet needs in the international neuroendocrine tumor (NET) community: Assessment of major gaps from the perspective of patients, patient advocates and NET health care professionals.

Simone Leyden, Teodora Kolarova, Catherine Bouvier, Martyn Caplin, Siobhan Conroy, Phillipa Davies, Sugandha Dureja, Massimo Falconi, Piero Ferolla, George Fisher and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Navigating care: understanding cancer patients' experiences with systemic radionuclide therapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Consensus on molecular imaging and theranostics in neuroendocrine neoplasms.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 19 institutions in 9 countries.

Simone LeydenThe Unicorn Foundation, Mosman, Australia.
Teodora KolarovaInternational Neuroendocrine Cancer Alliance (INCA), Boston, MA.
Catherine BouvierNET Patient Foundation, Leamington Spa, United Kingdom.
Martyn CaplinNeuroendocrine Tumour Unit, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Siobhan ConroyUnicorn Foundation, Auckland, New Zealand.
Phillipa DaviesRoyal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Sugandha DurejaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging, Fortis Memorial Research Institute, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
Massimo FalconiPancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Centre, San Raffaele Scientific Institute - "Vita e Salute" University, Milan, Italy.
Piero FerollaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Endocrine Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
George FisherStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Grace GoldsteinThe Carcinoid Cancer Foundation, White Plains, NY.
Rodney J HicksThe Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Ben LawrenceDiscipline of Oncology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Yoshiyuki MajimaPancreatic Cancer Action Network, Tokyo, Japan.
David C MetzDivision of Gastroenterology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Dermot O'TooleNational Centre for Neuroendocrine Tumours, St. Vincent's University and Department of Clinical Medicine, St. James Hospital and Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Philippe RuszniewskiDivision of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, Beaujon Hospital, Paris, France.
Bertram WiedenmannDepartment of Hepatology, Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, Charité Medical School, Berlin, Germany.
Ronald HollanderNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Foundation (NETRF), Boston, MA.
International Neuroendocrine Cancer Alliance (INCA)
Carcinoid Cancer Foundation · USCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEFortis Memorial Research Institute · INHealth Alliance International · USHôpital Beaujon · FRLeamington Spa Hospital · GBNational Heart Foundation of Australia · AUNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Foundation · USOticon Foundation in New Zealand · NZPancreatic Cancer Action Network · USPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUStanford University · USThe Royal Free Hospital · GBTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Perugia · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the increasing incidence and prevalence of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), there is a need to assess any gaps in awareness and care. A survey was undertaken in 2017 to identify perceived unmet needs from the perspectives of patients/families, patient advocates and health care professionals (HCPs). The survey consisted of 33-37 questions (depending on type of respondent) across four areas: information, care, treatments and research. In total, 443 participants from 26 countries responded: 338 patients/families, 35 advocates and 70 HCPs. Perceived unmet needs regarding provision of information at diagnosis differed between groups. While 59% of HCPs believed they provided sufficient information, informational needs were mostly/fully met for only 30% of patients and 18% of advocates. Additionally, 91% of patients and 97% of advocates felt that patients had to search for information themselves. Availability of Gallium-68-Dotatate PET/CT scan was limited for the majority of patients (patients: 73%; advocates: 85%; HCP: 86%), as was access to treatments, particularly peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (patients: 42%; advocates: 95%; HCPs: 77%). All groups felt that standards of care, including psychological needs and diagnosis of mental health, were not fully met. Although about two-thirds of patients were managed by a multidisciplinary team, 14% of patients reportedly did not have enough contact. All groups supported more patient involvement in research; patients and advocates prioritized improvement in diagnosis and HCPs focused on clinical trials. This survey revealed significant unmet needs but differing perceptions regarding these among the groups. There is a need for investigation and collaboration to improve standards of care for NET patients.

Indexed as

Global HealthAdolescentAdultGlobal Burden of DiseaseHealth CommunicationHealth PersonnelHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansIncidenceInformation Seeking BehaviorMedical OncologyMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsNeuroendocrinologyPatient AdvocacyPatient Participationneuroendocrine tumorperspectivestandards of caresurveyunmet needs

Identifiers

PMID31509608
PMCPMC7004101
OpenAlexW2972837996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.