Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31509208›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2019

Cost Minimization Analysis of Same-Day Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents.

Tracey A Wilkinson, Stephen M Downs, Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Single-Visit Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Initiation Among Adolescents Before and During COVID-19.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tracey A WilkinsonChildren's Health Services Research, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Stephen M DownsChildren's Health Services Research, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Brownsyne Tucker EdmondsPediatric and Adolescent Comparative Effectiveness Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.

Funding

A Navigator Program to Overcome Barriers to Hormonal ContraceptionK23HD094853 · NICHD · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI WILKINSON, TRACEY · 2019 to 2023
$795k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD094853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is considered first-line contraception for adolescents but often requires multiple clinic visits to obtain. Objective: To analyze Indiana Medicaid's cost savings associated with providing adolescents with same-day access to LARC. Design, Setting, and Participants: An economic evaluation of cost minimization from the payer's (Medicaid) perspective was performed from August 2017 through August 2018. The cost model examined the anticipated outcome of providing LARC at the first visit compared with requiring a second visit for placement. The costs and probabilities of clinic visits, devices, device insertions and removals, unintended pregnancy, and births, according to previously published sources, were incorporated into the model. The participants were payers (Medicaid). Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcomes were the cost of same-day LARC placement vs LARC placement at a subsequent visit in US dollars, and rates of unintended pregnancy and abortion. One-way sensitivity analysis was done. Results: Same-day LARC placement was associated with lower overall costs ($2016 per patient over 1 year) compared with LARC placement at a subsequent visit ($4133 per patient over 1 year). Compared with the return-visit strategy, same-day LARC was associated with an unintended pregnancy rate of 14% vs 48% and an abortion rate of 4% vs 14%. Conclusions and Relevance: Providing same-day LARC could save costs for Medicaid, largely by preventing unintended pregnancy. Expected cost savings could be used to implement policies that make this strategy feasible in all clinical settings.

Indexed as

Pregnancy, UnplannedAbortion, InducedAdolescentAmbulatory CareCesarean SectionCost-Benefit AnalysisCosts and Cost AnalysisCost SavingsDecision Support TechniquesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansIndianaLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionMedicaidPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID31509208
PMCPMC6739899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.