Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31509206›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2019

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Confirmatory Biopsy for Initiating Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer.

Rajiv Jayadevan, Ely R Felker, Lorna Kwan, Danielle E Barsa, Haoyue Zhang, Anthony E Sisk, Merdie Delfin, Leonard S Marks

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rajiv JayadevanDepartment of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles.
Ely R FelkerDepartment of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles.
Lorna KwanDepartment of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles.
Danielle E BarsaDepartment of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles.
Haoyue ZhangDepartment of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles.
Anthony E SiskDepartment of Pathology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles.
Merdie DelfinDepartment of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles.
Leonard S MarksDepartment of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles.
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer using MR/US FusionR01CA218547 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MARKS, LEONARD STEPHEN, NATARAJAN, SHYAM · 2017 to 2021
$3.1M
Biopsy Tracking and MRI Fusion to Enhance Imaging of Cancer Within the ProstateR01CA158627 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MARKS, LEONARD STEPHEN · 2011 to 2013
$1.4M
Prospective Assessment of Image Registration for the Diagnosis of Prostate CancerR01CA195505 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MARKS, LEONARD STEPHEN · 2015 to 2016
$705k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NCI NIH HHS R01 CA158627NCI NIH HHS R01 CA195505NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Transrectal, ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy often fails to disclose the severity of underlying pathologic findings for prostate cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy may improve the characterization of prostate pathologic results, but few studies have examined its use for the decision to enter active surveillance. Objective: To evaluate whether confirmatory biopsy findings by MRI guidance are associated with the risk of pathologic disease upgrading among patients with prostate cancer during active surveillance. Design, Settings, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used prospectively obtained registry data from 332 men with prostate cancer of Gleason grade group (GG) 2 or lower who were referred for active surveillance at a large academic medical center from January 1, 2009, through December 31, 2017. Exposures: All confirmatory and follow-up biopsies were performed using MRI guidance with an MRI-ultrasonography fusion device. Patients underwent repeated MRI-guided biopsies every 12 to 24 months. At follow-up sessions, in addition to obtaining systematic samples, lesions seen on MRI were targeted and foci of low-grade prostate cancer were obtained again using tracking technology. Active surveillance was terminated with detection of at least GG3 disease or receipt of treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was upgrading to at least GG3 disease during active surveillance. Secondary outcomes were the associations of MRI lesion grade, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, PSA density, and biopsy method (targeted, systematic, or tracked) with the primary outcome. Results: Of 332 patients (mean [SD] age, 62.8 [7.6] years), 39 (11.7%) upgraded to at least GG3 disease during follow-up. The incidence of upgrading was 7.9% (9 of 114) when the confirmatory biopsy finding was normal, 11.4% (20 of 175) when the finding showed GG1 disease, and 23.3% (10 of 43) when the finding was GG2 disease (P = .03). Men with GG2 disease were almost 8 times more likely to upgrade during surveillance compared with those with normal findings but only among those with low PSA density (hazard ratio [HR], 7.82; 95% CI, 2.29-26.68). A PSA density of at least 0.15 ng/mL/mL was associated with increased risk of upgrading among patients with normal findings (HR, 7.21; 95% CI, 1.98-26.24) or GG1 disease (HR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.16 to 7.03) on confirmatory biopsy. A total of 46% of pathologic disease upgrades would have been missed if only the targeted biopsy was performed and 65% of disease upgrades were detected only with tracked biopsy. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that confirmatory biopsy with MRI guidance is significantly associated with future disease upgrading of prostate cancer, especially when combined with PSA density, and should be considered as an appropriate entry point for active surveillance. Systematic and targeted biopsies were additive in detection of clinically significant cancers. Repeated biopsy at sites at which findings were previously abnormal (tracking biopsy) facilitated detection of cancers not suitable for continued active surveillance.

Indexed as

AgedCohort StudiesHumansImage-Guided BiopsyKallikreinsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingProportional Hazards ModelsProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyWatchful WaitingKallikreinsKLK3 protein, humanProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID31509206
PMCPMC6739900
OpenAlexW2973092921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.