Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31508853›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2020

Rural-Urban Differences in Breast Reconstruction Utilization Following Oncologic Resection.

Ryan C DeCoster, Robert-Marlo F Bautista, Jack C Burns, Adam J Dugan, R Wesley Edmunds, Brian D Rinker, J Matthew Webster, Henry C Vasconez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Breast Cancer Disparities and the Impact of Geography.Surgical oncology clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  10. Long-term Mammography Adherence among Uninsured Women Enrolled in the Breast Screening and Patient Navigation (BSPAN) Program.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ryan C DeCosterLucille P. Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.ORCID 0000-0001-5220-162X
Robert-Marlo F BautistaLucille P. Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Jack C BurnsDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Adam J DuganDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
R Wesley EdmundsDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Brian D RinkerDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
J Matthew WebsterDepartment of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Henry C VasconezDepartment of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.

Funding

Oncology Research Training for Surgeon-ScientistsT32CA160003 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Bernard Mark Evers, Pamela Carmen Hull · 2011 to 2026
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA160003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast reconstruction (BR) is the reconstructive surgical technique that focuses on restoring normal form and function to the breast following oncologic resection. The goal of this study was to determine if BR disparities exist among rural female patients in Kentucky.

methodsA retrospective (2006-2015), population-based cohort study was conducted on breast cancer patients (stages I-III) treated with mastectomy with or without BR. We used 2013 Beale codes to stratify patients according to geographic status. Chi-square tests were used to examine the association of BR along the rural-urban continuum. A multivariate logistic regression model controlling for patient, disease, and treatment factors was used to predict BR. The likelihood of BR was reported in odds ratios (OR) using a 95% confidence interval (CI).

resultsOverall, 10,032 patients met study criteria. Of those, 2,159 (21.5%) underwent BR. The rate of BR among urban, near-metro, and rural patients was 31.1%, 20.4%, and 13.4%, respectively (P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that women from near metro (OR 0.54, CI: 0.47-0.61; P < .001) and rural areas (OR 0.36, CI: 0.31-0.41; P < .001) were less likely to undergo BR than women from urban areas.

conclusionAlthough BR benefits are well documented, women from rural Kentucky undergo BR at lower rates and are less likely to receive BR than their urban counterparts. Efforts should seek to promote equitable access to BR for all patients, including those from rural areas.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammaplastyAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansKentuckyMastectomyMedicareRetrospective StudiesRural PopulationUnited StatesUrban Populationbreast cancerbreast reconstructionhealth care disparitiesrural health

Identifiers

PMID31508853
PMCPMC7064371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.