Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31508850›Full record

ArticleGlia2020

Gene expression profiling reveals a conserved microglia signature in larval zebrafish.

Julie Mazzolini, Sigrid Le Clerc, Gregoire Morisse, Cédric Coulonges, Laura E Kuil, Tjakko J van Ham, Jean-François Zagury, Dirk Sieger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Glia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Microglia response and function in a chronic model of photoreceptor damage.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Zebrafish models of human-duplicatedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Julie MazzoliniCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Sigrid Le ClercLaboratoire GBCM, EA7528, Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, HESAM Université, Paris, France.
Gregoire MorisseCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Cédric CoulongesLaboratoire GBCM, EA7528, Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, HESAM Université, Paris, France.
Laura E KuilDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Tjakko J van HamDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2175-8713
Jean-François ZaguryLaboratoire GBCM, EA7528, Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, HESAM Université, Paris, France.
Dirk SiegerCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6881-5183
Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers · FRUniversity of Edinburgh · GBErasmus MC · NL

Funding

Cancer Research UK 17494Cancer Research UK C49916/A17494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microglia are the resident macrophages of the brain. Over the past decade, our understanding of the function of these cells has significantly improved. Microglia do not only play important roles in the healthy brain but are involved in almost every brain pathology. Gene expression profiling allowed to distinguish microglia from other macrophages and revealed that the full microglia signature can only be observed in vivo. Thus, animal models are irreplaceable to understand the function of these cells. One of the popular models to study microglia is the zebrafish larva. Due to their optical transparency and genetic accessibility, zebrafish larvae have been employed to understand a variety of microglia functions in the living brain. Here, we performed RNA sequencing of larval zebrafish microglia at different developmental time points: 3, 5, and 7 days post fertilization (dpf). Our analysis reveals that larval zebrafish microglia rapidly acquire the core microglia signature and many typical microglia genes are expressed from 3 dpf onwards. The majority of changes in gene expression happened between 3 and 5 dpf, suggesting that differentiation mainly takes place during these days. Furthermore, we compared the larval microglia transcriptome to published data sets of adult zebrafish microglia, mouse microglia, and human microglia. Larval microglia shared a significant number of expressed genes with their adult counterparts in zebrafish as well as with mouse and human microglia. In conclusion, our results show that larval zebrafish microglia mature rapidly and express the core microglia gene signature that seems to be conserved across species.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAnimalsBrainLarvaMacrophagesMicroarray AnalysisMicrogliaSequence Analysis, RNATranscriptomeZebrafishbrainevolutionmicrogliaRNA sequencingtranscriptomezebrafish

Identifiers

PMID31508850
PMCPMC6916425
OpenAlexW2972796665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.