Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31508593›Full record

ArticleFood science of animal resources2019

Comparison of Functional Compounds and Micronutrients of Chicken Breast Meat by Breeds.

Mahabbat Ali, Seong-Yun Lee, Ji-Young Park, Samooel Jung, Cheorun Jo, Ki-Chang Nam

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science of animal resources, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Food science & nutrition · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mahabbat AliDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5332-7758
Seong-Yun LeeDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1361-1962
Ji-Young ParkDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9680-8685
Samooel JungDivision of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8116-188X
Cheorun JoCenter for Food and Bioconvergence, and Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2109-3798
Ki-Chang NamDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2432-3045
Sunchon National University · KRChungnam National University · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concentrations of functional compounds and micronutrients of chicken breast from native chickens were compared with those from broiler. Totally 200 male chicks from a commercial native chicken (HH) and three newly bred native chicken strains (2A, 2C, and 2D) were reared for about 2 kg of final live weight up to 12 wk. After slaughtered, antioxidant dipeptides, reducing sugar, free amino acids, vitamins, and minerals of the breast muscles were analyzed with those from broilers with similar live weight. Mostly native chicken strains had higher contents of carnosine, anserine, and reducing sugar than the broiler. Especially HH implied the highest values of carnosine and anserine, and 2C did the highest of reducing sugar (p<0.05). Vitamin A contents between native chickens and broiler were not significantly different (p>0.05). The contents of α-tocopherol were significantly higher in 2C than those of HH or broiler (p<0.05). Native chicken strains contained lower cholesterol levels than the broiler. Broiler had higher contents of P, Mg, and Na than native chickens (p<0.05), but it had lower content of Cu than HH or 2A. The savory free amino acids including glutamic acid was highest in 2A than the other native chickens and broiler (p<0.05). This study confirms that certain new strains of native chickens be a good source in terms of functional compounds and micronutrients which can be attractive health promoting nutritional quality factors.

Indexed as

antioxidant dipeptideschicken strainfunctional compoundsmicronutrientsreducing sugar

Identifiers

PMID31508593
PMCPMC6728819
OpenAlexW2966505834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.