Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31508498›Full record

ReviewNPJ digital medicine2019

Toward clinical digital phenotyping: a timely opportunity to consider purpose, quality, and safety.

Kit Huckvale, Svetha Venkatesh, Helen Christensen

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 198 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
198citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05415306 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

An Emoji-based Attention Bias Modification Intervention for Depressive Symptom Severity in Young Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversiti Tunku Abdul RahmanRan2022 to 2024Enrolled120ConditionsDepressive Symptoms, Mood DisordersArmsAttention Bias Modification, Deep-breathing training, Sham Training
NCT05681065 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Affective Based Integrated Care for Better Quality of Life (TeNDER).Pilot Implementation. Site 1: Primary Care Madrid, Spain.

TypeinterventionalSponsorGerencia de Atención Primaria, MadridRan2021 to 2023Enrolled534ConditionsChronic DiseaseArmsTeNDER tool
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

198 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Rethinking Ethics for an Era of Trusted Computational Tools.The Psychiatric clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  20. Article

138 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kit Huckvale1Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9088-6682
Svetha Venkatesh2A2I2, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC Australia.
Helen Christensen1Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0435-2065

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of data generated passively by personal electronic devices, such as smartphones, to measure human function in health and disease has generated significant research interest. Particularly in psychiatry, objective, continuous quantitation using patients' own devices may result in clinically useful markers that can be used to refine diagnostic processes, tailor treatment choices, improve condition monitoring for actionable outcomes, such as early signs of relapse, and develop new intervention models. If a principal goal for digital phenotyping is clinical improvement, research needs to attend now to factors that will help or hinder future clinical adoption. We identify four opportunities for research directed toward this goal: exploring intermediate outcomes and underlying disease mechanisms; focusing on purposes that are likely to be used in clinical practice; anticipating quality and safety barriers to adoption; and exploring the potential for digital personalized medicine arising from the integration of digital phenotyping and digital interventions. Clinical relevance also means explicitly addressing consumer needs, preferences, and acceptability as the ultimate users of digital phenotyping interventions. There is a risk that, without such considerations, the potential benefits of digital phenotyping are delayed or not realized because approaches that are feasible for application in healthcare, and the evidence required to support clinical commissioning, are not developed. Practical steps to accelerate this research agenda include the further development of digital phenotyping technology platforms focusing on scalability and equity, establishing shared data repositories and common data standards, and fostering multidisciplinary collaborations between clinical stakeholders (including patients), computer scientists, and researchers.

Indexed as

BiomarkersInformation technologyPsychiatric disorders

Identifiers

PMID31508498
PMCPMC6731256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.