Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31508489›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2019

Success rates of re-excision after positive margins for invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.

Merisa L Piper, Jasmine Wong, Kelly Fahrner-Scott, Cheryl Ewing, Michael Alvarado, Laura J Esserman, Rita A Mukhtar

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07131735 (Intraoperative Detection of Breast Cancer by Electrosurgical Gas Analysis and Artificial Intelligence), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07131735 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Intraoperative Detection of Breast Cancer by Electrosurgical Gas Analysis and Artificial Intelligence

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorPontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileRan2023 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsBreast Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Lobular Breast Cancer: A Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Merisa L Piper1Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9458-3782
Jasmine Wong2Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA USA.
Kelly Fahrner-Scott2Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA USA.
Cheryl Ewing2Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA USA.
Michael Alvarado2Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA USA.
Laura J Esserman2Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA USA.
Rita A Mukhtar2Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rates of positive margins after surgical resection of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) are high (ranging from 18 to 60%), yet the efficacy of re-excision lumpReceptor subtypeectomy for clearing positive margins is unknown. Concerns about the diffuse nature of ILC may drive increased rates of completion mastectomy to treat positive margins, thus lowering breast conservation rates. We therefore determined the success rate of re-excision lumpectomy in women with ILC and positive margins after surgical resection. We identified 314 cases of stage I-III ILC treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) at the University of California, San Francisco. Surgical procedures, pathology reports, and outcomes were analyzed using univariate and multivariate statistics and Cox-proportional hazards models. We evaluated outcomes before and after the year 2014, when new margin management consensus guidelines were published. Positive initial margins occurred in 118 (37.6%) cases. Of these, 62 (52.5%) underwent re-excision lumpectomy, which cleared the margin in 74.2%. On multivariate analysis, node negativity was significantly associated with successful re-excision (odds ratio [OR] 3.99, 95% CI 1.15-13.81,

Indexed as

Breast cancerCancer therapyOutcomes research

Identifiers

PMID31508489
PMCPMC6731236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.