Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31508479›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)2019

Key factors for the assessment of mobility in advanced dementia: A consensus approach.

Karen Van Ooteghem, Kristin E Musselman, Avril Mansfield, David Gold, Meghan N Marcil, Ron Keren, Maria Carmela Tartaglia, Alastair J Flint, Andrea Iaboni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. A program of SUPPORT-DPalliative & supportive care · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Karen Van OoteghemToronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kristin E MusselmanToronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Avril MansfieldToronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
David GoldNeuropsychology Clinic, Krembil Neuroscience Centre - Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Meghan N MarcilToronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ron KerenToronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Maria Carmela TartagliaMemory Clinic, University Health Network, Toronto, ON Canada.
Alastair J FlintDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Andrea IaboniToronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute · CAUniversity of Toronto · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAToronto Western Hospital · CAUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLoss of mobility is common in advanced dementia and has important negative consequences related to fall risk, loss of independence, and lack of participation in meaningful activities. The causes of decline are multifactorial, including disease-specific changes in motor function, behavior, and cognition. To optimize clinical management of mobility, there is a need to better characterize capacity for safe and independent mobility. This study aimed to identify key factors that impact on mobility in dementia.

methodsExpert input was gathered using a modified Delphi consensus approach. The primary criterion for participation was specialist knowledge in mobility or dementia, either as a clinician or a researcher. Participants rated elements of mobility for importance and feasibility of assessment in advanced dementia and prioritized items for inclusion in a mobility staging tool. Descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis were used to summarize responses.

resultsThirty-six experts completed the first survey with an 80% retention rate over three rounds. One-third of 61 items reached consensus for being both important and feasible to assess, representing five categories of elements. Items reaching agreement for a staging tool included walking, parkinsonism, gait, impulsivity, fall history, agitation, transfers, and posture control. DISCUSSION: This study highlights the need for a multidimensional, dementia-specific approach to mobility assessment. Results have implications for development of assessment methods and management guidelines to support the clinical care of mobility impairment in people with dementia.

Indexed as

AssessmentCognitive impairmentDementiaFallsGaitMobilityModified Delphi

Identifiers

PMID31508479
PMCPMC6726753
OpenAlexW2970991686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.