Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31508451›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2019

Research-training needs of clinical nurses: A nationwide study among tertiary hospitals in China.

Xue Wu, Xinjuan Wu, Yanhong Gao, Limin Wang, Jingfen Jin, Yinglan Li, Shouzhen Cheng, Xianxiu Wen, Aiping Wang, Qingyin Li and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Nurses as Gifted Artists in Caring: An Analysis of Nursing Care Concept.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Xue WuPeking University School of Nursing, Beijing, China.
Xinjuan WuPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yanhong GaoThe General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces, Beijing, China.
Limin WangPeking University School of Nursing, Beijing, China.
Jingfen JinThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Yinglan LiXiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.
Shouzhen ChengThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Xianxiu WenSichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Aiping WangThe First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Qingyin LiFuwai Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Shaomei ShangPeking University School of Nursing, Beijing, China.
Peking University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNCentral South University · CNChina Medical University · CNChinese People's Armed Police General Hospital · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNSichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital · CNThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate Chinese tertiary hospital nurses' research output, research ability, and their related training needs regarding scientific research methodology and analyze the relations among them.

methodsA nationwide survey was conducted in China on a large sample of tertiary hospital nurses (

resultsThe nurses' scientific research participation rates (with 4.13%, 7.85%, 5.35%, and 2.04% in research projects, research attendance, papers published, and patent, respectively) and their self-rated research skills 25.00 (12.50, 37.50) were very low. However, the research training needs were relatively high 53.12(37.50, 75.00). Significant differences in research participation rates (research projects, research attendance, papers published, and patent), scientific research skills, and research-training needs were determined by age, highest education level, nursing experience, employment, technical title, administrative post, and clinical tutoring experience (

conclusionsNurses' scientific research participation and self-rated research ability were below the optimal despite that they had relatively high research-training needs. Nurses should be provided further research training with tailored content to their characteristics and capacity.

Indexed as

HospitalNeeds assessmentNursing researchNursing staff

Identifiers

PMID31508451
PMCPMC6722478
OpenAlexW2947108707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.