ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2019
Myocardial infarction patients' learning needs: Perceptions of patients, family members and nurses.
Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Involving Families in Cardiac Care Through Remote Patient and Family Management: Focus Group and Journey Mapping Study.JMIR cardio · 2026Article
- The Process of Inefficient Self-Management in Patients With Myocardial Infarction in Prehospital: A Grounded Theory.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Perceived Health Needs, Social Support, and Depression Among Patients with Myocardial Infarction: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Nursing Interventions and Care Strategies for Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: A Comprehensive Review.Galen medical journal · 2023Article
- Disparities in the Use of Cardiac Rehabilitation in African Americans.Current cardiovascular risk reports · 2022Review
- Article
- Effects of a structured team nursing model on the efficacy and quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in myocardial infarction patients undergoing PCI.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis descriptive study aimed to identify and compare patient with myocardial infarction, their family member, and cardiac nurse perceptions on the learning needs of patients with myocardial infarction in the acute, sub-acute, and post-acute phases.
methodsA total of 288 patients with myocardial infarction, 145 family members, and 40 cardiac unit nurses were enrolled in this study. Data were collected by survey method using the Cardiac Patient Learning Need Inventory (CPLNI). Data analysis was done using descriptive statistical analysis and analysis of variance.
resultsThe results showed that the learning needs of patients with myocardial infarction were high according to the perceptions of patients, patients' family members, and nurses. There were differences in the priority of learning that the patient need in relation to the disease and healing process.
conclusionPatients, family members, and nurses have different perceptions regarding the learning needs of patients with myocardial infarction. To create adequate intervention to meet patient's learning needs, there should be an accurate assessment. The results of this study support the importance of patient-centered, individualized education and attention to learning priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.