Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31508405›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2019

Evaluation of Rapid Library Preparation Protocols for Whole Genome Sequencing Based Outbreak Investigation.

Helena M B Seth-Smith, Ferdinando Bonfiglio, Aline Cuénod, Josiane Reist, Adrian Egli, Daniel Wüthrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Whole-genome-based characterization ofMicrobial genomics · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Helena M B Seth-SmithDivision of Clinical Bacteriology and Mycology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Ferdinando BonfiglioApplied Microbiology Research, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Aline CuénodDivision of Clinical Bacteriology and Mycology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Josiane ReistApplied Microbiology Research, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Adrian EgliDivision of Clinical Bacteriology and Mycology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Daniel WüthrichDivision of Clinical Bacteriology and Mycology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) has become the new gold standard for bacterial outbreak investigation, due to the high resolution available for typing. While sequencing is currently predominantly performed on Illumina devices, the preceding library preparation can be performed using various protocols. Enzymatic fragmentation library preparation protocols are fast, have minimal hands-on time, and work with small quantities of DNA. The aim of our study was to compare three library preparation protocols for molecular typing: Nextera XT (Illumina); Nextera Flex (Illumina); and QIAseq FX (Qiagen). We selected 12 ATCC strains from human Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens with %G+C-content ranging from 27% (

Indexed as

bacteriacomparisonIlluminalibrarynext generation sequencingNGSprokaryoteswhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID31508405
PMCPMC6719548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.