Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31508230›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2019

Effects of live yeast on differential genetic and functional attributes of rumen microbiota in beef cattle.

Ibukun M Ogunade, Jerusha Lay, Kenneth Andries, Christina J McManus, Frederick Bebe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Transcriptome Analysis and CFEM Gene Overexpression inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Meta-analysis ofHeliyon · 2023
    Article
  10. MegasphaeraTranslational animal science · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ibukun M OgunadeCollege of Agriculture, Communities, and the Environment, Kentucky State University, Frankfort, KY 40601 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3875-6156
Jerusha LayCollege of Agriculture, Communities, and the Environment, Kentucky State University, Frankfort, KY 40601 USA.
Kenneth AndriesCollege of Agriculture, Communities, and the Environment, Kentucky State University, Frankfort, KY 40601 USA.
Christina J McManusCollege of Agriculture, Communities, and the Environment, Kentucky State University, Frankfort, KY 40601 USA.
Frederick BebeCollege of Agriculture, Communities, and the Environment, Kentucky State University, Frankfort, KY 40601 USA.
Kentucky State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have evaluated the effects of live yeast supplementation on rumen microbial population; however, its effect on differential microbial genes and their functional potential has not been described. Thus, this study applied shotgun metagenomic sequencing to evaluate the effects of live yeast supplementation on genetic and functional potential of the rumen microbiota in beef cattle. Eight rumen-cannulated Holstein steers were randomly assigned to two treatments in a cross-over design with two 25-day experimental periods and a 10-day wash-out between the two periods. The steers were housed in individual pens and fed 50% concentrate-mix and 50% red clover/orchard hay

Indexed as

Functional potentialLive yeastRumen

Identifiers

PMID31508230
PMCPMC6724239
OpenAlexW2971709419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.