Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31507601›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2019

Improved Overall Survival, Relapse-Free-Survival, and Less Graft-vs.-Host-Disease in Patients With High Immune Reconstitution of TCR Gamma Delta Cells 2 Months After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Lia Minculescu, Hanne Vibeke Marquart, Lars Peter Ryder, Niels Smedegaard Andersen, Ida Schjoedt, Lone Smidstrup Friis, Brian Thomas Kornblit, Søren Lykke Petersen, Eva Haastrup, Anne Fischer-Nielsen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cancer immunotherapy by γδ T cells.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Controversial role of γδ T cells in colorectal cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lia MinculescuDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hanne Vibeke MarquartDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars Peter RyderDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Niels Smedegaard AndersenDepartment of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ida SchjoedtDepartment of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lone Smidstrup FriisDepartment of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Brian Thomas KornblitDepartment of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Søren Lykke PetersenDepartment of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eva HaastrupDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne Fischer-NielsenDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Joanne ReekieDepartment of Infectious Diseases, PERSIMUNE, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henrik SengelovDepartment of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T-cell receptor (TCR) γδ cells are perceived as innate-like effector cells with the possibility of mediating graft-vs. -tumor (GVT) without causing graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) in the setting of hematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We conducted a prospective study to assess the clinical impact of TCR γδ cell immune reconstitution on overall survival, relapse-free-survival, relapse and GVHD. The impact of CD3, CD4, and CD8 T cells together with NK cells including subtypes were analyzed in parallel. A total of 108 patients with hematological malignancies transplanted with HLA-matched, T cell replete stem cell grafts were included for analyses of absolute concentrations of CD3, CD4, and CD8 positive T cells and NK cells together with a multi-color flow cytometry panel with staining for TCRαβ, TCRγδ, Vδ1, Vδ2, CD3, CD4, CD8, HLA-DR, CD196, CD45RO, CD45RA, CD16, CD56, CD337, and CD314 at 28, 56, 91, 180, and 365 days after transplantation. Immune reconstitution data including subsets and differentiation markers of T and NK cells during the first year after transplantation was provided. Patients with TCR γδ cell concentrations above the median value of 21 (0-416) × 10

Indexed as

Immune ReconstitutionAdultAgedFemaleGraft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansImmunity, InnateImmunophenotypingMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltaT-Lymphocyte SubsetsTransplantation ConditioningTransplantation, HomologousTransplantation ImmunologyReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltaallogeneic stem cell transplantationcell therapygamma delta (γδ) T cellsinnate immunologytransplant immunology

Identifiers

PMID31507601
PMCPMC6714591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.