Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31507460›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2019

Effects of Resistance Exercise and Nutritional Supplementation on Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation in Head-Down Bed Rest.

Marc Kermorgant, Nathalie Nasr, Marc-Antoine Custaud, Nastassia Navasiolava, Philippe Arbeille, Patrick Guinet, Marc Labrunée, Florent Besnier, Dina N Arvanitis, Marek Czosnyka and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Postural influence on intracranial fluid dynamics: an overview.Journal of physiological anthropology · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Alterations in Cerebral Hemodynamics During Microgravity: A Literature Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Marc KermorgantINSERM UMR 1048, Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases (I2MC), Toulouse, France.
Nathalie NasrINSERM UMR 1048, Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases (I2MC), Toulouse, France.
Marc-Antoine CustaudMITOVASC Institute, UMR CNRS 6015, UMR INSERM 1083, Clinical Research Centre, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France.
Nastassia NavasiolavaMITOVASC Institute, UMR CNRS 6015, UMR INSERM 1083, Clinical Research Centre, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France.
Philippe ArbeilleFaculty of Medicine, University of Tours, Tours, France.
Patrick GuinetDepartment of Anesthesiology, Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Marc LabrunéeINSERM UMR 1048, Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases (I2MC), Toulouse, France.
Florent BesnierINSERM UMR 1048, Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases (I2MC), Toulouse, France.
Dina N ArvanitisINSERM UMR 1048, Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases (I2MC), Toulouse, France.
Marek CzosnykaBrain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Jean-Michel SenardINSERM UMR 1048, Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases (I2MC), Toulouse, France.
Anne Pavy-Le TraonINSERM UMR 1048, Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases (I2MC), Toulouse, France.
Institut des Maladies Métaboliques et Cardiovasculaires · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FRUniversité de Rennes · FRUniversité de Toulouse · FRUniversité de Tours · FRUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Head-down bed rest (HDBR) is commonly considered as ground-based analog to spaceflight and simulates the headward fluid shift and cardiovascular deconditioning associated with spaceflight. We investigated in healthy volunteers whether HDBR, with or without countermeasures, affect cerebral autoregulation (CA). Twelve men (at selection: 34 ± 7 years; 176 ± 7 cm; 70 ± 7 kg) underwent three interventions of a 21-day HDBR: a control condition without countermeasure (CON), a condition with resistance vibration exercise (RVE) comprising of squats, single leg heel, and bilateral heel raises and a condition using also RVE associated with nutritional supplementation (NeX). Cerebral blood flow velocity was assessed using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. CA was evaluated by transfer function analysis and by the autoregulatory index (Mxa) in order to determine the relationship between mean cerebral blood flow velocity and mean arterial blood pressure. In RVE condition, coherence was increased after HDBR. In CON condition, Mxa index was significantly reduced after HDBR. In contrast, in RVE and NeX conditions, Mxa were increased after HBDR. Our results indicate that HDBR without countermeasures may improve dynamic CA, but this adaptation may be dampened with RVE. Furthermore, nutritional supplementation did not enhance or worsen the negative effects of RVE. These findings should be carefully considered and could not be applied in spaceflight. Indeed, the subjects spent their time in supine position during bed rest, unlike the astronauts who perform normal daily activities.

Indexed as

cerebral autoregulationhead-down bed restmicrogravitynutritional supplementationresistance vibration exercise

Identifiers

PMID31507460
PMCPMC6718616
OpenAlexW2968138466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.