Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31507408›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2019

Microglial Drug Targets in AD: Opportunities and Challenges in Drug Discovery and Development.

Knut Biber, Anindya Bhattacharya, Brian M Campbell, Justin R Piro, Michael Rohe, Roland G W Staal, Robert V Talanian, Thomas Möller

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Targeting Progranulin as an Immuno-Neurology Therapeutic Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. [Neuropathology of dementia].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Knut BiberAbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Neuroscience Research, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Anindya BhattacharyaJanssen Research & Development LLC, San Diego, CA, United States.
Brian M CampbellSage Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Justin R PiroAbbVie Foundational Neuroscience Center, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Michael RoheAbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Neuroscience Research, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Roland G W StaalParacelsus Neuroscience, Metuchen, NJ, United States.
Robert V TalanianAbbVie Foundational Neuroscience Center, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Thomas MöllerAbbVie Foundational Neuroscience Center, Cambridge, MA, United States.
AbbVie (United States) · USAbbVie (Germany) · DEJanssen (United States) · USSage Therapeutics (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a large and increasing unmet medical need with no disease-modifying treatment currently available. Genetic evidence from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and gene network analysis has clearly revealed a key role of the innate immune system in the brain, of which microglia are the most important element. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes predominantly expressed in microglia have been associated with altered risk of developing AD. Furthermore, microglia-specific pathways are affected on the messenger RNA (mRNA) expression level in post-mortem AD tissue and in mouse models of AD. Together these findings have increased the interest in microglia biology, and numerous scientific reports have proposed microglial molecules and pathways as drug targets for AD. Target identification and validation are generally the first steps in drug discovery. Both target validation and drug lead identification for central nervous system (CNS) targets and diseases entail additional significant obstacles compared to peripheral targets and diseases. This makes CNS drug discovery, even with well-validated targets, challenging. In this article, we will illustrate the special challenges of AD drug discovery by discussing the viability/practicality of possible microglia drug targets including cluster of differentiation 33 (CD33), K

Indexed as

drug targetmicrogliascreening cascadetarget identificationtarget validation

Identifiers

PMID31507408
PMCPMC6716448
OpenAlexW2969887678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.