Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31507394›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2019

Predicting Ventral Striatal Activation During Reward Anticipation From Functional Connectivity at Rest.

Asako Mori, Manfred Klöbl, Go Okada, Murray Bruce Reed, Masahiro Takamura, Paul Michenthaler, Koki Takagaki, Patricia Anna Handschuh, Satoshi Yokoyama, Matej Murgas and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Editorial: Insights in motivation and reward - 2022.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Asako MoriDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Manfred KlöblDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Go OkadaDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Murray Bruce ReedDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Masahiro TakamuraDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Paul MichenthalerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Koki TakagakiHealth Service Center, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Patricia Anna HandschuhDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Satoshi YokoyamaDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Matej MurgasDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Naho IchikawaDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Gregor GryglewskiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Chiyo ShibasakiDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Marie SpiesDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Atsuo YoshinoDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Andreas HahnDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Yasumasa OkamotoDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Rupert LanzenbergerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Shigeto YamawakiDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Siegfried KasperDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATHiroshima University · JP

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF DOC 33
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reward anticipation is essential for directing behavior toward positively valenced stimuli, creating motivational salience. Task-related activation of the ventral striatum (VS) has long been used as a target for understanding reward function. However, some subjects may not be able to perform the respective tasks because of their complexity or subjects' physical or mental disabilities. Moreover, task implementations may differ, which results in limited comparability. Hence, developing a task-free method for evaluating neural gain circuits is essential. Research has shown that fluctuations in neuronal activity at rest denoted individual differences in the brain functional networks. Here, we proposed novel models to predict the activation of the VS during gain anticipation, using the functional magnetic resonance imaging data of 45 healthy subjects acquired during a monetary incentive delay task and under rest. In-sample validation and held-out data were used to estimate the generalizability of the models. It was possible to predict three measures of reward activation (sensitivity, average, maximum) from resting-state functional connectivity (Pearson's

Indexed as

monetary incentive delay taskMRIpredictionrestventral striatum

Identifiers

PMID31507394
PMCPMC6718467
OpenAlexW2968086537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.