Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31507360›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019

Vagus Nerve Stimulation-Induced Laryngeal Motor Evoked Potentials: A Possible Biomarker of Effective Nerve Activation.

Simone Vespa, Lars Stumpp, Charlotte Bouckaert, Jean Delbeke, Hugo Smets, Joaquin Cury, Susana Ferrao Santos, Herbert Rooijakkers, Antoine Nonclercq, Robrecht Raedt and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Simone VespaInstitute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Lars StumppInstitute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Charlotte Bouckaert4Brain, Institute for Neurosciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Jean DelbekeInstitute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Hugo SmetsBio, Electro And Mechanical Systems, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Joaquin CuryBio, Electro And Mechanical Systems, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Susana Ferrao SantosInstitute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Herbert RooijakkersDepartment of Neurosurgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Antoine NonclercqBio, Electro And Mechanical Systems, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Robrecht Raedt4Brain, Institute for Neurosciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Kristl Vonck4Brain, Institute for Neurosciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Riëm El TahryInstitute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
UCLouvain · BEGhent University · BEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BECliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy is associated with laryngeal muscle activation and induces voice modifications, well-known side effects of the therapy resulting from co-activation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. In this study, we describe the non-invasive transcutaneous recording of laryngeal motor evoked potentials (LMEPs), which could serve as a biomarker of effective nerve activation and individual titration in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. We recruited drug-resistant epileptic patients treated for at least 6 months with a VNS. Trains of 600-1200 VNS pulses were delivered with increasing current outputs. We placed six skin electrodes on the ventral surface of the neck, in order to record LMEPs whenever the laryngeal muscular threshold was reached. We studied the internal consistency and the variability of LMEP recordings, and compared different methods for amplitude calculation. Recruitment curves were built based on the stimulus-response relationship. We also determined the electrical axis of the LMEPs dipole in order to define the optimal electrode placement for LMEPs recording in a clinical setting. LMEPs were successfully recorded in 11/11 patients. The LMEPs threshold ranged from 0.25 to 1 mA (median 0.50 mA), and onset latency was between 5.37 and 8.77 ms. The signal-to-noise ratio was outstanding in 10/11 patients. In these cases, excellent reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC > 0.90 across three different amplitude measurements) was achieved with 10 sample averages. Moreover, our recordings showed very good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.95 for 10 epochs). Area-under-the-curve and peak-to-peak measurement proved to be complementary methods for amplitude calculation. Finally, we determined that an optimal derivation requires only two recording electrodes, aligned on a horizontal axis around the laryngeal prominence. In conclusion, we describe here an optimal methodology for the recording of VNS-induced motor evoked responses from the larynx. Although further clinical validation is still necessary, LMEPs might be useful as a non-invasive marker of effective nerve activation, and as an aid for the clinician to perform a more rational titration of VNS parameters.

Indexed as

biomarkerselectrical axisepilepsyinternal consistencylarynxmotor evoked potentialsreliabilityvagus nerve stimulation (VNS)

Identifiers

PMID31507360
PMCPMC6718640
OpenAlexW2965199606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.