Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31507353›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019

Dynamics of Segregation and Integration in Directional Brain Networks: Illustration in Soldiers With PTSD and Neurotrauma.

D Rangaprakash, Michael N Dretsch, Jeffrey S Katz, Thomas S Denney, Gopikrishna Deshpande

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

D RangaprakashDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, AU MRI Research Center, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Michael N DretschU.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory, Fort Rucker, AL, United States.
Jeffrey S KatzDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, AU MRI Research Center, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Thomas S DenneyDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, AU MRI Research Center, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Gopikrishna DeshpandeDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, AU MRI Research Center, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Auburn University · USWalter Reed Army Institute of Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain functioning relies on various segregated/specialized neural regions functioning as an integrated-interconnected network (i.e., metastability). Various psychiatric and neurologic disorders are associated with aberrant functioning of these brain networks. In this study, we present a novel framework integrating the strength and temporal variability of metastability in brain networks. We demonstrate that this approach provides novel mechanistic insights which enables better imaging-based predictions. Using whole-brain resting-state fMRI and a graph-theoretic framework, we integrated strength and temporal-variability of complex-network properties derived from effective connectivity networks, obtained from 87 U.S. Army soldiers consisting of healthy combat controls (

Indexed as

complex network modelingdynamic connectivityeffective connectivityfunctional MRImachine learningmild traumatic brain injurynetwork dynamicsposttraumatic stress disorder

Identifiers

PMID31507353
PMCPMC6716456
OpenAlexW2956536593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.