Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31507335›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2019

Academic detailing as a method of continuing medical education.

Roar Dyrkorn, Harald Christian Langaas, Trude Giverhaug, Ketil Arne Espnes, Debra Rowett, Olav Spigset

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Roar DyrkornDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8217-7579
Harald Christian LangaasRegional Medicines Information and Pharmacovigilance Centre (RELIS), Department of Clinical Pharmacology, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6787-5552
Trude GiverhaugRegional Medicines Information and Pharmacovigilance Centre (RELIS), University Hospital of North-norway, Tromsoe, North-Norway.
Ketil Arne EspnesDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3566-3328
Debra RowettRepatriation General Hospital, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Olav SpigsetDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7902-9014
St Olav's University Hospital · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NOUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcademic detailing is an interactive educational outreach to prescribers to present unbiased, non-commercial, evidence-based information, mostly about medications, with the goal of improving patient care. Academic detailing in Norway is an approach for providing continuing medical education to general practitioners (GPs). The basis of academic detailing is a one-to-one discussion between a trained health professional (the academic detailer) and the GP at the GP's workplace.

methodOur first campaign was named "Better use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)

resultsMore than 90% the participating GPs considered academic detailing a suitable method for providing up-to-date evidence-based, manufacturer-independent information, and nearly all would most likely or probably welcome another visit. After the intervention there was a reduction of diclofenac prescribing of 16% and 18%, respectively, in the two cities.

conclusionWe consider that academic detailing is a suitable method to bring the best available evidence to the point at which care is delivered, to achieve the best for the patients. According to the Norwegian GPs' evaluation, it is a key supplement to other methods of continuing medical education. To have maximum impact, it is important that academic detailing is practiced according to the consensus that has evolved in the USA and Australia.

Indexed as

academic detailingeducational outreach visitsgeneral practicegeneral practitionersquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID31507335
PMCPMC6719842
OpenAlexW2970230313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.