ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2019
Development of a Robust Indirect Approach for MM → QM Free Energy Calculations That Combines Force-Matched Reference Potential and Bennett's Acceptance Ratio Methods.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantum-Centric Alchemical Free Energy Calculations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Architecture-Independent Absolute Solvation Free Energy Calculations with Neural Network Potentials.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025Article
- Toward Improving Multiple Time Step QM/MM Simulations with Δ-Machine Learning.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Enhanced Calculation of Quantum-Classical Binding Free Energies.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Recent Developments in Amber Biomolecular Simulations.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- FE-ToolKit: A Versatile Software Suite for Analysis of High-Dimensional Free Energy Surfaces and Alchemical Free Energy Networks.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Computation of Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energies with a Quantum Mechanics-Based Mining Minima Algorithm.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Machine learning in molecular biophysics: Protein allostery, multi-level free energy simulations, and lipid phase transitions.Biophysics reviews · 2025Review
- Insights and Challenges in Correcting Force Field Based Solvation Free Energies Using a Neural Network Potential.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Article
- Software Infrastructure for Next-Generation QM/MM-ΔMLP Force Fields.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Article
- Convergence criteria for single-step free-energy calculations: the relation between the Π bias measure and the sample variance.Chemical science · 2024Article
- Alchemical Enhanced Sampling with Optimized Phase Space Overlap.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Flexibility of Binding Site is Essential to the CaJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2024Article
- Perspectives on Computational Enzyme Modeling: From Mechanisms to Design and Drug Development.ACS omega · 2024Review
- Modern Alchemical Free Energy Methods for Drug Discovery Explained.ACS physical chemistry Au · 2023Review
- Free energies at QM accuracy from force fields via multimap targeted estimation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- AmberTools.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023Article
- Accurate and Efficient Multilevel Free Energy Simulations with Neural Network-Assisted Enhanced Sampling.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023Article
- DeePMD-kit v2: A software package for deep potential models.The Journal of chemical physics · 2023Article
- Bridging semiempirical and ab initio QM/MM potentials by Gaussian process regression and its sparse variants for free energy simulation.The Journal of chemical physics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We use the PBE0/6-31G* density functional method to perform ab initio quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) molecular dynamics (MD) simulations under periodic boundary conditions with rigorous electrostatics using the ambient potential composite Ewald method in order to test the convergence of MM → QM/MM free energy corrections for the prediction of 17 small-molecule solvation free energies and eight ligand binding free energies to T4 lysozyme. The "indirect" thermodynamic cycle for calculating free energies is used to explore whether a series of reference potentials improve the statistical quality of the predictions. Specifically, we construct a series of reference potentials that optimize a molecular mechanical (MM) force field's parameters to reproduce the ab initio QM/MM forces from a QM/MM simulation. The optimizations form a systematic progression of successively expanded parameters that include bond, angle, dihedral, and charge parameters. For each reference potential, we calculate benchmark quality reference values for the MM → QM/MM correction by performing the mixed MM and QM/MM Hamiltonians at 11 intermediate states, each for 200 ps. We then compare forward and reverse application of Zwanzig's relation, thermodynamic integration (TI), and Bennett's acceptance ratio (BAR) methods as a function of reference potential, simulation time, and the number of simulated intermediate states. We find that Zwanzig's equation is inadequate unless a large number of intermediate states are explicitly simulated. The TI and BAR mean signed errors are very small even when only the end-state simulations are considered, and the standard deviations of the TI and BAR errors are decreased by choosing a reference potential that optimizes the bond and angle parameters. We find a robust approach for the data sets of fairly rigid molecules considered here is to use bond + angle reference potential together with the end-state-only BAR analysis. This requires QM/MM simulations to be performed in order to generate reference data to parametrize the bond + angle reference potential, and then this same simulation serves a dual purpose as the full QM/MM end state. The convergence of the results with respect to time suggests that computational resources may be used more efficiently by running multiple simulations for no more than 50 ps, rather than running one long simulation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.