Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31507077›Full record

ArticleArthritis care & research2020

Treatment Delays Associated With Prior Authorization for Infusible Medications: A Cohort Study.

Zachary S Wallace, Tyler Harkness, Xiaoqing Fu, John H Stone, Hyon K Choi, Rochelle P Walensky

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis care & research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zachary S WallaceMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-4708-7038
Tyler HarknessMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Xiaoqing FuMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
John H StoneMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-6588-9435
Hyon K ChoiMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-2862-0442
Rochelle P WalenskyMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Impact of ANCA Type and Rituximab vs. Cyclophosphamide on Cardiovascular Risk, Mortality, and Quality-Adjusted Life Years inANCA-Associated VasculitisK23AR073334 · NIAMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WALLACE, ZACHARY SCOTT · 2018 to 2022
$948k
NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR073334NIAMS NIH HHS L30 AR070520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrior authorizations (PAs) are commonly used by health payers as cost-containment strategies for expensive medications, including infused biologics. There is scarce data about the effect of PA requirements on patient-oriented outcomes.

methodsWe included patients for whom an infusible medication was prescribed for a rheumatologic condition. The exposures of interest were a PA requirement and whether or not the PA was denied. The primary outcome was the difference in days from medication request to infusion. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of denied PAs and differences in glucocorticoid exposure following a PA request.

resultsOf the 225 patients, the infusible medications of 160 (71%) required a PA. PAs were associated with a greater number of days to infusion compared to cases in which no authorization was required (median 31 days [interquartile range (IQR) 15-60 days] versus median 27 days [IQR 13-41 days]; P = 0.045), especially among the 33 patients (21%) whose PA was denied initially (median 50 days [IQR 31-76 days] versus median 27 days [IQR 13-41 days]; P < 0.001). PA denials were associated with greater prednisone-equivalent glucocorticoid exposure in the 3 months following the request than when a PA was not required (median 605 mg [IQR 0-1,575] versus median 160 mg [IQR 0-675]; P = 0.01). Twenty-seven of the 33 PA requests that were initially denied (82%) were eventually approved. Thus, 96% of all PAs were ultimately approved.

conclusionPA requirements are associated with treatment delays and denials are associated with greater glucocorticoid exposure. Because the great majority of PA requests are ultimately approved, the value of PA requirements and their impact on patient safety should be reevaluated.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiological ProductsFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansInfusions, IntravenousLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPrior AuthorizationRheumatic DiseasesTime-to-TreatmentBiological ProductsGlucocorticoids

Identifiers

PMID31507077
PMCPMC7062557
OpenAlexW2972961026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.