Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31506884›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2019

Patient-Specific Simulation of Pneumoperitoneum for Laparoscopic Surgical Planning.

Shivali Dawda, Mafalda Camara, Philip Pratt, Justin Vale, Ara Darzi, Erik Mayer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05039333 (Prospective Observational Clinical Study to Prove Safety and Effectiveness When Applying RUS™ Surgical Navigation, Endoscopic Imaging Treatment Planning Software, in Gastric Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05039333 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Observational Clinical Study to Prove Safety and Effectiveness When Applying RUS™ Surgical Navigation, Endoscopic Imaging Treatment Planning Software, in Gastric Cancer Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorHutom CorpRan2021 to 2022Enrolled36ConditionsSurgery, Gastric CancerArmsRUS(TM) software : surgical navigation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shivali DawdaDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. shivali.dawda@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3091-2305
Mafalda CamaraDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Philip PrattDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Justin ValeDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ara DarziDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Erik MayerDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR200035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gas insufflation in laparoscopy deforms the abdomen and stretches the overlying skin. This limits the use of surgical image-guidance technologies and challenges the appropriate placement of trocars, which influences the operative ease and potential quality of laparoscopic surgery. This work describes the development of a platform that simulates pneumoperitoneum in a patient-specific manner, using preoperative CT scans as input data. This aims to provide a more realistic representation of the intraoperative scenario and guide trocar positioning to optimize the ergonomics of laparoscopic instrumentation. The simulation was developed by generating 3D reconstructions of insufflated and deflated porcine CT scans and simulating an artificial pneumoperitoneum on the deflated model. Simulation parameters were optimized by minimizing the discrepancy between the simulated pneumoperitoneum and the ground truth model extracted from insufflated porcine scans. Insufflation modeling in humans was investigated by correlating the simulation's output to real post-insufflation measurements obtained from patients in theatre. The simulation returned an average error of 7.26 mm and 10.5 mm in the most and least accurate datasets respectively. In context of the initial discrepancy without simulation (23.8 mm and 19.6 mm), the methods proposed here provide a significantly improved picture of the intraoperative scenario. The framework was also demonstrated capable of simulating pneumoperitoneum in humans. This study proposes a method for realistically simulating pneumoperitoneum to achieve optimal ergonomics during laparoscopy. Although further studies to validate the simulation in humans are needed, there is the opportunity to provide a more realistic, interactive simulation platform for future image-guided minimally invasive surgery.

Indexed as

AnimalsInsufflationLaparoscopyPneumoperitoneum, ArtificialPreoperative CareReproducibility of ResultsSurgical InstrumentsSwineTomography, X-Ray ComputedLaparoscopyPatient-specificPneumoperitoneumSimulationSurgical planning

Identifiers

PMID31506884
PMCPMC6736924
OpenAlexW2973126251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.