Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31506881›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2020

Online mobile C-arm calibration using inertial sensors: a preliminary study in order to achieve CBCT.

Imane Lemammer, Olivier Michel, Hacheme Ayasso, Steeve Zozor, Guillaume Bernard

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A fully automatic fiducial detection and correspondence establishing method for online C-arm calibration.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. 3D-XGuide: open-source X-ray navigation guidance system.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Imane LemammerGIPSA-Lab, Grenoble INP, CNRS, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000, Grenoble, France. lemammer.imane@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7627-2710
Olivier MichelGIPSA-Lab, Grenoble INP, CNRS, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Hacheme AyassoGIPSA-Lab, Grenoble INP, CNRS, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Steeve ZozorGIPSA-Lab, Grenoble INP, CNRS, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Guillaume BernardThales AVS France, 460 Rue du Pommarin, 38430, Moirans, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCone beam computed tomography (CBCT) became increasingly popular over the last years. It allows more accurate diagnosis and treatment planning with a lower effective radiation dose. However, volume reconstruction algorithms require a very precise knowledge of the imaging geometry. Due to mechanical instabilities, mobile C-arms are incompatible with existing tomography algorithms. Therefore, C-arm online calibration is essential in order to achieve an accurate volume reconstruction.

methodsWe present an online calibration method for mobile C-arms. It is based on tracking the detector and the X-ray source of the C-arm using three-axis gyroscopes and accelerometers. It aims to be precise and noninvasive. The performance of the calibration algorithm is evaluated in regard to the precision of the sensors and to whether or not dynamic models are considered. In addition, we present an algorithm which propagate the errors from the positions and orientations estimates to the 2D projections on the detector plane. Thus, we can evaluate the impact of the estimation errors on the acquired images.

resultsThe experiments are conducted on an experimental C-arm. The reached accuracy is [Formula: see text] for orientation and [Formula: see text] for position. These errors propagate as an error of [Formula: see text] for the 2D projections on the detector plane.

conclusionsThe proposed calibration algorithm achieves an accuracy comparable to the precision of existing calibration methods. The required angle accuracy by CBCT algorithms is reached. However, improvements are needed to achieve the required position precision. The in-plane translations of the X-ray source and the detector are the most crucial parameters to estimate in order to conduct CBCT on mobile C-arms.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCalibrationCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansPhantoms, ImagingCBCTError propagationIMUMobile C-armOnline calibrationPose estimation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.