ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2019
Effects of inclined surfaces on gait variability and stability in unilateral lower limb amputees.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Therapeutic benefits of lower limb prostheses: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Pooled it
- Article
- Unsupervised Cluster Analysis of Walking Activity Data for Healthy Individuals and Individuals with Lower Limb Amputation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Evaluation of an ankle-foot orthosis effect on gait transitional stability during ramp ascent/descent.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2022Article
- Evaluation of an articulated passive ankle-foot prosthesis.Biomedical engineering online · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to analyze gait variability and stability of individuals with amputation walking on upward (8%), horizontal (0%), and downward (- 8%) inclines, by using linear and nonlinear descriptors. Trunk linear variability and gait spatiotemporal parameters were evaluated. Nonlinear variability (local dynamic stability-LDS), was estimated by the maximum Lyapunov exponent (λ) computed from a trunk marker velocity. The gait descriptors were compared among three distinct groups (N participants): unilateral transtibial amputees (TTA, N = 12); unilateral transfemoral amputees (TFA, N = 13); control group (CT, N = 15). For step width and support phase, the effect of inclination was greater for TFA group, especially in the DOWN condition. Linear variability was higher for amputees (TFA and TTA) especially in the UP condition in the medial-lateral and anterior-posterior directions. TTA and TFA groups presented greater λ values than CT group in medial-lateral direction indicating decreased LDS, but TFA group presented smaller λ values than TTA and CT groups in the V direction. Our findings showed that inclination introduced significant changes in the estimated parameters for all groups, with greater changes for amputee groups. Furthermore, the level of amputation directly affects the analyzed gait parameters being the TFA group the one which presents greater changes. Graphical abstract The objective of this study was to analyze gait variability of individuals with amputation walking on (A) upward (+ 8%), (B) horizontal (0%), and (C) downward (- 8%) inclines, by using linear and nonlinear biomechanical descriptors. Linear measures of variability, such trunk variability and gait spatiotemporal parameters were evaluated. Nonlinear variability was estimated by the exponent of divergence (maximum Lyapunov exponent) of the velocity of a marker fixed in the subject's trunk while walking on inclined surfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31506856What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.