Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31506760›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2020

Feeding Honeybee Colonies with Honeybee-Specific Lactic Acid Bacteria (Hbs-LAB) Does Not Affect Colony-Level Hbs-LAB Composition or Paenibacillus larvae Spore Levels, Although American Foulbrood Affected Colonies Harbor a More Diverse Hbs-LAB Community.

Sepideh Lamei, Jörg G Stephan, Bo Nilson, Sander Sieuwerts, Kristian Riesbeck, Joachim R de Miranda, Eva Forsgren

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Microbial communities associated with honey bees in Brazil and in the United States.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021
    Article
  12. Characterization ofCells · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Antimicrobial Activity againstAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sepideh LameiDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jörg G StephanDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden. jorg.stephan@slu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6195-7867
Bo NilsonClinical Microbiology, Labmedicine, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8103-4856
Sander SieuwertsArla Innovation Center, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2401-6763
Kristian RiesbeckClinical Microbiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6274-6965
Joachim R de MirandaDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0335-0386
Eva ForsgrenDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8244-7265
Lund University · SESwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEArla Foods (Denmark) · DK

Funding

Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas 222-2013-423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main current methods for controlling American Foulbrood (AFB) in honeybees, caused by the bacterial pathogen Paenibacillus larvae, are enforced incineration or prophylactic antibiotic treatment, neither of which is fully satisfactory. This has led to an increased interest in the natural relationships between the pathogenic and mutualistic microorganisms of the honeybee microbiome, in particular, the antagonistic effects of Honeybee-Specific Lactic Acid Bacteria (hbs-LAB) against P. larvae. We investigated whether supplemental administration of these bacteria affected P. larvae infection at colony level over an entire flowering season. Over the season, the supplements affected neither colony-level hbs-LAB composition nor naturally subclinical or clinical P. larvae spore levels. The composition of hbs-LAB in colonies was, however, more diverse in apiaries with a history of clinical AFB, although this was also unrelated to P. larvae spore levels. During the experiments, we also showed that qPCR could detect a wider range of hbs-LAB, with higher specificity and sensitivity than mass spectrometry. Honeybee colonies are complex super-organisms where social immune defenses, natural homeostatic mechanisms, and microbiome diversity and function play a major role in disease resistance. This means that observations made at the individual bee level cannot be simply extrapolated to infer similar effects at colony level. Although individual laboratory larval assays have clearly demonstrated the antagonistic effects of hbs-LAB on P. larvae infection, the results from the experiments presented here indicate that direct conversion of such practice to colony-level administration of live hbs-LAB is not effective.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAnimal FeedAnimalsBeesDietLactobacillalesLarvaPaenibacillus larvaeSpores, BacterialAmerican foulbroodApis melliferaBeneficial microbesBifidobacteriumIntestinal microbiotaLactobacillus

Identifiers

PMID31506760
PMCPMC7176604
OpenAlexW2972682324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.