Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31506749›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2020

Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants and children: is it superior to conventional laparoscopy?

Ciro Andolfi, Brittany Adamic, Jerry Oommen, Mohan S Gundeti

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06349161 (Long-term Outcome of Retroperitoneoscopic One-trocar-assisted Pyeloplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06349161 completednot on this map

Long-term Outcome of Retroperitoneoscopic One-trocar-assisted Pyeloplasty: A Single-center and Single-surgeon Experience

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Children's Hospital, VietnamRan2011 to 2024Enrolled70ConditionsUreteropelvic Junction ObstructionArmsOne-trocar-assisted pyeloplasty
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [Trends in upper urinary tract reconstruction surgery over a decade based on a multi-center database].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Are there disparities in access to robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery among pediatric urology patients? US institutional experience.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ciro AndolfiPediatric Urology, Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Comer Children's Hospital, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. candolfi@surgery.bsd.uchicago.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1844-377X
Brittany AdamicPediatric Urology, Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Comer Children's Hospital, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jerry OommenMichigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Mohan S GundetiPediatric Urology, Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Comer Children's Hospital, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Comer Children's Hospital · USMichigan State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOpen pyeloplasty (OP) has been the first-line treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) since it was first described by Anderson and Hynes. The use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to treat UPJO in the pediatric population has increased in recent years, due to decreased morbidity and shorter recovery times. Recently, robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) has seen a steady expansion. Unlike laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP), RALP comes with a more manageable learning curve aided by specialized technological advantages such as high-resolution three-dimensional view, tremor filtration with motion scaling, and highly dexterous wrist-like instruments. With this review, we aim to highlight the trend toward robotic pyeloplasty over laparoscopy and current available evidence on outcomes.

methodsWe systematically searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases, and we critically reviewed the available literature on the use of laparoscopy and robotic technology in pediatric patients with UPJO.

resultsOverall, we selected 19 original articles and 5 meta-analyses. The available literature showed that the robotic approach to the UPJO allowed for decreased operative times, shorter length of hospital stay, lower complication rates, with success rates comparable to LP. Conflicting results persist regarding robotic platform and equipment costs.

conclusionWhile laparoscopy requires advanced skills for complex reconstructive procedures, such as pyeloplasty, robot-assisted surgery offers the valuable potential of making MIS more accessible to these types of procedure. Robotic technology has contributed to shortening the learning curve by acting as a bridge between open and endoscopic approach. There is still a strong need for higher quality evidence in the form of prospective observational studies and clinical trials, as well as further cost-effectiveness analyses. As robotic surgical technology spreads, future systems will be developed, offering smaller and more flexible tools, allowing enhanced applications on pediatric patients.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresChildHumansInfantKidney PelvisLaparoscopyTreatment OutcomeUreteral ObstructionUrologic Surgical ProceduresLaparoscopic pyeloplastyPediatric urologyRobot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplastyRobotic pyeloplastyUreteropelvic junction obstruction

Identifiers

PMID31506749
OpenAlexW2972625962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.