Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31506672›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2019

The neural mechanisms of social reward in early psychosis.

Anne-Kathrin J Fett, Elias Mouchlianitis, Paula M Gromann, Lucy Vanes, Sukhi S Shergill, Lydia Krabbendam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Trust learning in the repeated trust game: A meta-analytic study.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Social Reward Learning Deficits and Concordant Brain Alterations in Rats Overexpressing Disrupted-in-Schizophrenia 1 (DISC1).The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Social identification and paranoia.Royal Society open science · 2024
    Article
  6. Value Representations of Spite Sensitivity in Psychosis on the Minnesota Trust Game.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Social reward, punishment, and prosociality in paranoia.Journal of abnormal psychology · 2021
    Article
  12. Grant Report on Social Reward Learning in SchizophreniaJournal of psychiatry and brain science · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anne-Kathrin J FettDepartment of Psychology, City University of London, London ECIV 0HB, United Kingdom.
Elias MouchlianitisKing's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychosis Studies, De Crespigny Park, SE5 8AF, London, United Kingdom.
Paula M GromannDepartment of Psychology, City University of London, London ECIV 0HB, United Kingdom.
Lucy VanesKing's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychosis Studies, De Crespigny Park, SE5 8AF, London, United Kingdom.
Sukhi S ShergillKing's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychosis Studies, De Crespigny Park, SE5 8AF, London, United Kingdom.
Lydia KrabbendamDepartment of Developmental and Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, VU Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 1s, 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0901868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In chronic psychosis, reduced trust is associated with a neural insensitivity to social reward and reduced theory of mind (ToM). Here we investigate whether these mechanisms could underlie emerging social impairments in early psychosis. Twenty-two participants with early psychosis and 25 controls (male, 13-19 years) participated in two interactive trust games against a cooperative and unfair partner. Region of interest neuroimaging analyses included right caudate, medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ), involved in reward and ToM processing. Both groups showed similar levels of trust (i.e. investments). However, individuals with psychosis failed to activate the caudate differentially in response to cooperation and unfairness while making decisions to trust. During cooperative returns, patients showed reduced and controls increased caudate activation. Patients demonstrated greater rTPJ activation than controls, possibly pointing towards compensatory mechanisms. Effects were associated with Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence vocabulary scores. No group differences emerged in mPFC activation. Early psychosis is associated with an aberrant neural sensitivity to social reward. This could foster reduced social motivation and social isolation. Absent behavioural differences in early, relative to chronic psychosis could indicate that trust is achieved through increased compensatory demand on ToM.

Indexed as

RewardSocial BehaviorAdultDecision MakingFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePrefrontal CortexProblem BehaviorPsychotic DisordersTheory of MindTrustadolescenceearly psychosisfMRIneuroeconomicssocial cognitiontrust

Identifiers

PMID31506672
PMCPMC6847053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.