ArticleScientific reports2019
Design, construction and characterisation of a novel nanovibrational bioreactor and cultureware for osteogenesis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biochemical and Physicomechanical Cues of Biomaterials Guide Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Mechanical Phenotyping of MG63s Following Vibrational Stimulation.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026Article
- A Tympanic Piezo-Bioreactor Modulates Ion Channel-Associated Mechanosignaling to Stabilize Phenotype and Promote Tenogenesis in Human Tendon-Derived Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Nanovibrational Stimulation ofACS nano · 2024Article
- Developing and Investigating a Nanovibration Intervention for the Prevention/Reversal of Bone Loss Following Spinal Cord Injury.ACS nano · 2024Article
- Development and Characterization of a low intensity vibrational system for microgravity studies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Integrating physicomechanical and biological strategies for BTE: biomaterials-induced osteogenic differentiation of MSCs.Theranostics · 2023Review
- Design, fabrication, and characterization of a multimodal reconfigurable bioreactor for bone tissue engineering.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2022Article
- Supramolecular Peptide Nanofiber Hydrogels for Bone Tissue Engineering: From Multihierarchical Fabrications to Comprehensive Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- Nanovibrational stimulation inhibits osteoclastogenesis and enhances osteogenesis in co-cultures.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Remote-Controlled 3D Porous Magnetic Interface toward High-Throughput Dynamic 3D Cell Culture.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2021Article
- The use of nanovibration to discover specific and potent bioactive metabolites that stimulate osteogenic differentiation in mesenchymal stem cells.Science advances · 2021Article
- Article
- A standalone bioreactor system to deliver compressive load under perfusion flow to hBMSC-seeded 3D chitosan-graphene templates.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Mechanical regulation of mesenchymal stem cell osteogenesis, bone matrix homoeostasis, and skeletal pathology.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In regenerative medicine, techniques which control stem cell lineage commitment are a rapidly expanding field of interest. Recently, nanoscale mechanical stimulation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has been shown to activate mechanotransduction pathways stimulating osteogenesis in 2D and 3D culture. This has the potential to revolutionise bone graft procedures by creating cellular graft material from autologous or allogeneic sources of MSCs without using chemical induction. With the increased interest in mechanical stimulation of cells and huge potential for clinical use, it is apparent that researchers and clinicians require a scalable bioreactor system that provides consistently reproducible results with a simple turnkey approach. A novel bioreactor system is presented that consists of: a bioreactor vibration plate, calibrated and optimised for nanometre vibrations at 1 kHz, a power supply unit, which supplies a 1 kHz sine wave signal necessary to generate approximately 30 nm of vibration amplitude, and custom 6-well cultureware with toroidal shaped magnets incorporated in the base of each well for conformal attachment to the bioreactor's magnetic vibration plate. The cultureware and vibration plate were designed using finite element analysis to determine the modal and harmonic responses, and validated by interferometric measurement. This helps ensure that the vibration plate and cultureware, and thus collagen and MSCs, all move as a rigid body, avoiding large deformations close to the resonant frequency of the vibration plate and vibration damping beyond the resonance. Assessment of osteogenic protein expression was performed to confirm differentiation of MSCs after initial biological experiments with the system, as well as atomic force microscopy of the 3D gel constructs during vibrational stimulation to verify that strain hardening of the gel did not occur. This shows that cell differentiation was the result of the nanovibrational stimulation provided by the bioreactor alone, and that other cell differentiating factors, such as stiffening of the collagen gel, did not contribute.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.