Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31506471›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

ePath: an online database towards comprehensive essential gene annotation for prokaryotes.

Xiangzhen Kong, Bin Zhu, Victoria N Stone, Xiuchun Ge, Fadi E El-Rami, Huangfu Donghai, Ping Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Environmental flexibility does not explain metabolic robustness.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2020
    Article
  7. Ranking essential bacterial processes by speed of mutant death.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  8. High-Throughput Screen for Cell Wall Synthesis Network Module inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiangzhen KongPhilips Institute for Oral Health Research, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7220-9941
Bin ZhuPhilips Institute for Oral Health Research, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2829-2925
Victoria N StonePhilips Institute for Oral Health Research, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States of America.
Xiuchun GePhilips Institute for Oral Health Research, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States of America.
Fadi E El-RamiPhilips Institute for Oral Health Research, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States of America.
Huangfu DonghaiApplication Services, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America.
Ping XuPhilips Institute for Oral Health Research, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States of America. pxu@vcu.edu.
Virginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Interaction of Colonizer and Pathogen In Oral BiofilmR01DE023078 · NIDCR · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI XU, PING · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
Regulation Of Fitness And Virulence In Oral StreptococciR01DE018138 · NIDCR · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI XU, PING · 2008 to 2012
$1.7M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE018138NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE023078U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) R01DE018138U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) R01DE023078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental techniques for identification of essential genes (EGs) in prokaryotes are usually expensive, time-consuming and sometimes unrealistic. Emerging in silico methods provide alternative methods for EG prediction, but often possess limitations including heavy computational requirements and lack of biological explanation. Here we propose a new computational algorithm for EG prediction in prokaryotes with an online database (ePath) for quick access to the EG prediction results of over 4,000 prokaryotes ( https://www.pubapps.vcu.edu/epath/ ). In ePath, gene essentiality is linked to biological functions annotated by KEGG Ortholog (KO). Two new scoring systems, namely, E_score and P_score, are proposed for each KO as the EG evaluation criteria. E_score represents appearance and essentiality of a given KO in existing experimental results of gene essentiality, while P_score denotes gene essentiality based on the principle that a gene is essential if it plays a role in genetic information processing, cell envelope maintenance or energy production. The new EG prediction algorithm shows prediction accuracy ranging from 75% to 91% based on validation from five new experimental studies on EG identification. Our overall goal with ePath is to provide a comprehensive and reliable reference for gene essentiality annotation, facilitating the study of those prokaryotes without experimentally derived gene essentiality information.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDatabases, FactualGenes, EssentialMolecular Sequence AnnotationComputational BiologyComputer SimulationProkaryotic Cells

Identifiers

PMID31506471
PMCPMC6737131
OpenAlexW2973219450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.