Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31506445›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Mathematical modeling for bioprocess optimization of a protein drug, uricase, production by Aspergillus welwitschiae strain 1-4.

Noura El-Ahmady El-Naggar, S A Haroun, Eman M El-Weshy, E A Metwally, A A Sherief

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. High Cell Density Culture of DairyFood and bioprocess technology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Noura El-Ahmady El-NaggarDepartment of Bioprocess Development, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute, City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications, Alexandria, 21934, Egypt. nouraelahmady@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8493-9194
S A HarounDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Eman M El-WeshyDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
E A MetwallyDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
A A SheriefDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mansoura University · EGCity of Scientific Research and Technological Applications · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial uricase is effective protein drug used to treat hyperuricemia and its complications, including chronic gout, also in prophylaxis and treatment of tumor lysis and organ transplants hyperuricemia. Uricase is commonly used as diagnostic reagent in clinical analysis for quantification of uric acid in blood and other biological fluids. Also, it can be used as an additive in formulations of hair coloring agents. A newly isolated strain, Aspergillus sp. 1-4, was able to produce extracellular uricase on a medium containing uric acid as inducer. Phylogenetic analysis based on ITS region sequence analysis and phenotypic characteristics showed that Aspergillus sp. strain 1-4 is closely related to Aspergillus welwitschiae and its nucleotide sequence was deposited in the GenBank database and assigned sequence accession number MG323529. Statistical screening using Plackett-Burman design with 20 runs was applied to screen fifteen factors for their significance on uricase production by Aspergillus welwitschiae. Results of statistical analysis indicated that incubation time has the most significant positive effect on uricase production followed by yeast extract and inoculum size with the highest effect values of 13.48, 5.26 and 4.75; respectively. The interaction effects and optimal levels of these factors were evaluated using central composite design. The maximum uricase production was achieved at incubation time (5 days), yeast extract (2 g/L) and inoculum size (4 mL/50 mL medium) are the optimum levels for maximum uricase production (60.03 U/mL). After optimization, uricase production increased by 3.02-folds as compared with that obtained from the unoptimized medium (19.87 U/mL).

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAspergillusBiotransformationCulture MediaFermentationGenetic EngineeringPhylogenyUrate OxidaseCulture MediaUrate Oxidase

Identifiers

PMID31506445
PMCPMC6736946
OpenAlexW2973030071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.