ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2020
Regulating Preimplantation Genetic Testing across the World: A Comparison of International Policy and Ethical Perspectives.
Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Old and new" frontiers in embryo viability assessment: current practices and introduction of emerging approaches.Biology of reproduction · 2026Review
- Drawing lines: how the public defines "Serious" genetic conditions for reproductive testing.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Public perceptions of polygenic testing and embryo selection for non-medical traits.Nature human behaviour · 2026Article
- Sickle Cell Disease: From Ancient Origins to Modern Breakthroughs in Gene Therapy.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Impact of revised severity criteria on the acceptability of PGT-M for childhood-onset cancer predisposition syndromes: a survey of genetic professionals in Japan.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- The Promise and Peril of Precision Medicine : How Asian Perspectives on Naturalness Can Help to Reframe Disability Narratives.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2026Article
- International Survey on Genetic Literacy and Awareness in Patients With Spinal and Bulbar Muscular Atrophy.Neurology. Genetics · 2026Article
- Governance of polygenic embryo screening: a qualitative study on the perspectives of clinicians and patients.Fertility and sterility · 2026Article
- Mitochondrial donation: beyond the first healthy births.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- A Human Rights-Based Approach to Accessing Preimplantation Genetic Testing: The Case of Argentina.Health and human rights · 2025Article
- Imagining and Preventing the Future Existence of Bodies with Variations in Sex Characteristics.Archives of sexual behavior · 2025Article
- Polygenic risk scores and embryonic screening: considerations for regulation.Journal of medical ethics · 2025Article
- Reevaluating 'seriousness' in genetic conditions: balancing clinical criteria and lived experiences.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- Foretelling the Future: Preimplantation Genetic Testing and the Coming of Polygenic Embryo Screening.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Legal protections forFrontiers in reproductive health · 2025Review
- Policy solutions to improve access to fertility treatment and optimise patient care: consensus from an expert forum.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Review
- The clinical application and challenges of preimplantation genetic testing.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Non-invasive prediction of human embryonic ploidy using artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Polygenic embryo screening: quo vadis?Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Review
- Obesity and Nutrigenetics Testing: New Insights.Nutrients · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is a reproductive technology that, in the course of in vitro fertilization (IVF), allows prospective parents to select their future offspring based on genetic characteristics. PGT could be seen as an exercise of reproductive liberty, thus potentially raising significant socioethical and legal controversy. In this review, we examine-from a comparative perspective-variations in policy approaches to the regulation of PGT. We draw on a sample of 19 countries (Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Singapore, South Korea, Switzerland, United Kingdom, and the United States) to provide a global landscape of the spectrum of policy and legislative approaches (e.g., restrictive to permissive, public vs. private models). We also explore central socioethical and policy issues and contentious applications, including permissibility criteria (e.g., medical necessity), nonmedical sex selection, and reproductive tourism. Finally, we further outline genetic counseling requirements across policy approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.