Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31505983›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2020

Pipeline embolization for an iatrogenic intracranial internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysm after transsphenoidal pituitary tumor surgery: Case report and review of the literature.

Yasuhiko Nariai, Yosuke Kawamura, Tomoji Takigawa, Akio Hyodo, Kensuke Suzuki

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yasuhiko NariaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6391-1002
Yosuke KawamuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Tomoji TakigawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Akio HyodoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Kensuke SuzukiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Social Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial pseudoaneurysms are uncommon and among the most difficult lesions to treat with surgery or endovascular means without parent artery sacrifice. Here, we report on a patient who underwent successful treatment using a flow-diverting stent for an iatrogenic intracranial internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysm following a vessel injury after endoscopic pituitary tumor resection via the transsphenoidal approach. A 62-year-old man with a Rathke's cleft cyst presenting with bitemporal hemianopia and progressive decline of left visual acuity underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary tumor resection. During dura incision, brisk arterial bleeding was encountered from the right internal carotid artery. Immediate packing was performed, and hemostasis was achieved. Three days after the vessel injury, an angiography revealed a pseudoaneurysm (2.9 × 2.1 mm) at the cavernous segment of the right internal carotid artery, which showed enlargement on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging at six days postoperatively. Pipeline embolization was performed nine days after the vessel injury. Angiography performed one month after Pipeline embolization revealed significant stagnation but not complete occlusion of blood flow inside the pseudoaneurysm cavity. Dual antiplatelet therapy was replaced with single antiplatelet therapy. Follow-up angiograms three months after Pipeline embolization confirmed complete obliteration of the pseudoaneurysm and successful endoluminal reconstruction of the damaged vessel. Despite the possibility of short-term bleeding and the need for dual antiplatelet therapy administration for a certain period, the use of flow-diverting stents is a feasible vessel-sparing option in the management of intracranial internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysms resulting from transsphenoidal surgery injuries if intraoperative hemodynamic stability can be achieved with effective packing.

Indexed as

Iatrogenic DiseaseCarotid Artery InjuriesCarotid Artery, InternalCentral Nervous System CystsCerebral AngiographyEmbolization, TherapeuticHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPituitary NeoplasmsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPostoperative ComplicationsSphenoid BoneStentsTreatment OutcomePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsIntracranial pseudoaneurysmPipelinetranssphenoidal surgery

Identifiers

PMID31505983
PMCPMC6997992
OpenAlexW2972313226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.