Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31505800›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Proposed Lyme Disease Guidelines and Psychiatric Illnesses.

Robert C Bransfield, Michael J Cook, Douglas R Bransfield

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Microbes and Mental Illness: Past, Present, and Future.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Detection and Transstadial Passage ofHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robert C BransfieldDepartment of Psychiatry, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA. Robert.bransfield@hackensackmeridian.org.
Michael J CookIndependent Researcher, Dorset BH23 5BN, UK. mcook98@msn.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0678-1819
Douglas R BransfieldGeneral Counsel Red Paladin, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA. Dbransfield@redpaladin.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Infectious Disease Society of America, American Academy of Neurology, and American Academy of Rheumatology jointly proposed Lyme disease guidelines. Four areas most relevant to psychiatry were reviewed-the disclaimer, laboratory testing, and adult and pediatric psychiatric sections. The disclaimer and the manner in which these guidelines are implemented are insufficient to remove the authors and sponsoring organizations from liability for harm caused by these guidelines. The guidelines and supporting citations place improper credibility upon surveillance case definition rather than clinical diagnosis criteria. The guidelines fail to address the clear causal association between Lyme disease and psychiatric illnesses, suicide, violence, developmental disabilities and substance abuse despite significant supporting evidence. If these guidelines are published without very major revisions, and if the sponsoring medical societies attempt to enforce these guidelines as a standard of care, it will directly contribute to increasing a national and global epidemic of psychiatric illnesses, suicide, violence, substance abuse and developmental disabilities and the associated economic and non-economic societal burdens. The guideline flaws could be improved with a more appropriate disclaimer, an evidence-based rather than an evidence-biased approach, more accurate diagnostic criteria, and recognition of the direct and serious causal association between Lyme disease and psychiatric illnesses.

Indexed as

American Academy of Neurology (AAN)American Academy of Rheumatology (AAR)disclaimerguidelinesInfectious Disease Society of America (IDSA)Lyme diseasemental illnessespsychiatricstandards

Identifiers

PMID31505800
PMCPMC6787753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.