Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31505650›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2019

The impact of dietary supplementation of arginine during gestation in a commercial swine herd: II. Offspring performance.

Elizabeth A Hines, Matthew R Romoser, Zoë E Kiefer, Aileen F Keating, Lance H Baumgard, Jarad Niemi, Benjamin Haberl, Noel H Williams, Brian J Kerr, Kevin J Touchette and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Synergistic effects ofVeterinary world · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth A HinesDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Matthew R RomoserDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Zoë E KieferDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Aileen F KeatingDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Lance H BaumgardDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Jarad NiemiDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Benjamin HaberlIowa Select Farms, Iowa Falls, IA.
Noel H WilliamsIowa Select Farms, Iowa Falls, IA.
Brian J KerrUSDA-ARS-National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, Ames, IA.
Kevin J TouchetteAjinomoto Animal Nutrition North America, Inc., Chicago, IL.
Jason W RossDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Iowa State University · USAjinomoto (United States) · USNational Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arginine (Arg) is an important amino acid of pig fetal development; however, whether Arg improves postnatal performance is ill-defined. Therefore, the influence of Arg supplementation at different gestational stages on offspring performance was evaluated in a commercial swine herd. Sows (n = 548) were allocated into 4, diet by stage of gestation treatments: Control (n = 143; 0% suppl. Arg), or dietary treatments supplemented with 1% L-Arg (free-base; Ajinomoto Animal Nutrition North America, Inc., Chicago, IL): from 15 to 45 d of gestation (n = 138; Early-Arg); 15 d of gestation to farrowing (n = 139; Full-Arg); and from day 85 of gestation to farrowing (n = 128; Late-Arg). All offspring were individually identified and weighed at birth; at weaning, a subset was selected for evaluation of carcass performance at market. All data were analyzed using birth weight (BiWt) and age as covariates. Wean weights (WW) and prewean (PW) ADG tended to increase (P = 0.06) in progeny from sows supplemented with Arg, as compared to progeny from Control sows. Preplanned contrast comparisons revealed an increased (P = 0.03) BiWt for pigs from sows receiving 1% L-Arg prior to day 45 of gestation (Early-Arg and Full-Arg; 1.38 kg/pig), as compared to pigs from sows not supplemented prior to day 45 of gestation (Control and Late-Arg; 1.34 kg/pig). No difference in BiWt was observed (1.36 kg/pig; P = 0.68) for Arg supplementation after day 85 of gestation (Full-Arg and Late-Arg), as compared to those not receiving Arg supplementation after day 85 (Control and Early-Arg); although WW and PW ADG were greater (P = 0.02), respectively. A 3.6% decrease (P = 0.05) in peak lean accretion ADG occurred when dams received 1% L-Arg prior to day 45 of gestation (Early-Arg and Full-Arg), however, no other significant differences were detected in finishing growth parameters or carcass characteristics (P ≥ 0.1). Pig mortality rates tended (P = 0.07) to decrease in progeny of dams supplemented Arg after day 85 (3.6%) compared to dams not provided additional Arg during late gestation (4.9%). Collectively, these data suggest that Arg provided during late gestation may improve WW and PW ADG, however, finishing performance was not affected. While Arg supplementation provided some moderate production benefits, further investigation is warranted to comprehensively understand the gestational timing and biological role of Arg supplementation during fetal and postnatal development in commercial production systems.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAnimalsArginineBirth WeightDietFemaleParturitionPregnancySwineWeaningArginineargininefetal programminggrowthmortalitypigswine

Identifiers

PMID31505650
PMCPMC6735700
OpenAlexW2969729075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.