ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2019
Evaluation of UVA emission from x-ray megavoltage-irradiated tissues and phantoms.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigation of Photodynamic Therapy Promoted by Cherenkov Light Activated Photosensitizers-New Aspects and Revelations.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Psoralen as a Photosensitizers for Photodynamic Therapy by Means of In Vitro Cherenkov Light.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
RECA (Radiotherapy enhanced with Cherenkov photo-activation) is a proposed treatment where the anti-cancer drug psoralen is photo-activated in situ by UVA (Ultraviolet A, 320-400 nm) Cherenkov light (CL) produced directly by the treatment beam itself. In this study, we develop a UVA-imaging technique to quantify relative UVA CL produced by bulk tissues and other phantoms upon clinical x-ray megavoltage irradiation. UVA CL emission (320-400 nm) was quantified in tissue samples of porcine and poultry and in two kinds of solid waters (SW): brown (Virtual Waters, Standard Imaging, WI) and white (Diagnostic Therapy, CIRS, VA), and in 1% agarose gels variously doped with absorbing dye. Quantification was achieved through cumulative imaging of the samples placed in a dark, light-blocking chamber during irradiation on a Varian 21 EX accelerator. UVA imaging required a specialized high-sensitivity cooled camera equipped with UVA lenses and a filter. At 15 MV, white SW emitted [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] less UVA than chicken breast, pork loin and pork belly, respectively. Similar under-response was observed at 6 MV. Brown SW had [Formula: see text] less UVA emission than white SW at 15 MV, and negligible emission at 6 MV. Agarose samples (1% by weight) doped with 250 ppm India ink exhibited equivalent UVA CL emission to chicken breast (within 8%). The results confirm that for the same absorbed dose, SW emits less UVA light than the tissue samples, indicating that prior in vitro studies utilizing SW as the CL-generating source may have underestimated the RECA therapeutic effect. Agarose doped with 250 ppm India ink is a convenient tissue-equivalent phantom for further work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.