ReviewAnnual review of genetics2019
Evolutionary Ecology of
Review in Annual review of genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
103 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wolbachia strain wLhui induces temperature-dependent incomplete cytoplasmic incompatibility in the invasive pest Liriomyza huidobrensis with biocontrol potential.Pest management science · 2026Article
- Pervasive effects ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Feeding-state is associated with shifts in the Haemaphysalis bispinosa microbiome and its potential as a sentinel for circulating livestock pathogens.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- Temperature-sensitive cytoplasmic incompatibility across divergent Wolbachia partly reflects cifB transcription, not endosymbiont density.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Can the leafhopper microbiome unlock new strategies for its control?Journal of economic entomology · 2026Review
- Interactions Between Inbreeding, Fitness and the Bacterial Microbiome inEvolutionary applications · 2026Article
- Thermal sensitivity in a symbiont: effect of elevated cyclic temperature exposure on Wolbachia density in Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) embryos.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2026Article
- Research Trends and Collaborative Patterns inInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Climate predictsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Three decades of analyzing Wolbachia bacterial endosymbionts in arthropods: Trends and gaps.Parasitology research · 2026Review
- Molecular detection and maternal transmission of Microsporidia MB in the field-caught Anopheles coluzzii in Cameroon.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Temperature-sensitive cytoplasmic incompatibility across divergentbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Editorial: New Frontiers inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Wolbachia introgression in Rio de Janeiro remains at sub-optimal levels 30 months after its decline: challenges in the sustainability of wMel interventions for dengue control.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2026Article
- Article
- Heterogeneity in inhibition of genetically diverse dengue virus strains bybioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Stochastic Fluctuations of the Facultative EndosymbiontEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- The long-term persistence of the wMel strain in Rio de Janeiro is threatened by poor integrated vector management and bacterium fitness cost on Aedes aegypti.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Reciprocal Host-Evolutionary applications · 2025Article
43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.