Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31505037›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2019

Mating system variation in hybrid zones: facilitation, barriers and asymmetries to gene flow.

Melinda Pickup, Yaniv Brandvain, Christelle Fraïsse, Sarah Yakimowski, Nicholas H Barton, Tanmay Dixit, Christian Lexer, Eva Cereghetti, David L Field

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Relationships withinPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The extent of introgression between incipientProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Genomic evidence for three distinct species in theConservation genetics (Print) · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Melinda PickupInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, Am Campus 1, Klosterneuburg, 3400, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6118-0541
Yaniv BrandvainDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, 1500 Gortner Ave, St Paul, Minneapolis, MN, 55108, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3392-0220
Christelle FraïsseInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, Am Campus 1, Klosterneuburg, 3400, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8441-5075
Sarah YakimowskiDepartment of Biology, Queen's University, 116 Barrie St, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2465-5314
Nicholas H BartonInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, Am Campus 1, Klosterneuburg, 3400, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8548-5240
Tanmay DixitDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK.
Christian LexerDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, A-1030, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7221-7482
Eva CereghettiInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, Am Campus 1, Klosterneuburg, 3400, Austria.
David L FieldDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, A-1030, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4014-8478

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant mating systems play a key role in structuring genetic variation both within and between species. In hybrid zones, the outcomes and dynamics of hybridization are usually interpreted as the balance between gene flow and selection against hybrids. Yet, mating systems can introduce selective forces that alter these expectations; with diverse outcomes for the level and direction of gene flow depending on variation in outcrossing and whether the mating systems of the species pair are the same or divergent. We present a survey of hybridization in 133 species pairs from 41 plant families and examine how patterns of hybridization vary with mating system. We examine if hybrid zone mode, level of gene flow, asymmetries in gene flow and the frequency of reproductive isolating barriers vary in relation to mating system/s of the species pair. We combine these results with a simulation model and examples from the literature to address two general themes: (1) the two-way interaction between introgression and the evolution of reproductive systems, and (2) how mating system can facilitate or restrict interspecific gene flow. We conclude that examining mating system with hybridization provides unique opportunities to understand divergence and the processes underlying reproductive isolation.

Indexed as

Gene FlowHybridization, GeneticAllelesComputer SimulationCrosses, GeneticModels, BiologicalPlantsReproductionReproductive IsolationSelf-Incompatibility in Flowering Plantsgene flowhybridizationintrogressionmating systemreproductive isolation

Identifiers

PMID31505037
PMCPMC6856794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.