Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31504812›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2020

Simultaneous targeting of DNA replication and homologous recombination in glioblastoma with a polyether ionophore.

Yi Chieh Lim, Kathleen S Ensbey, Carolin Offenhäuser, Rochelle C J D'souza, Jason K Cullen, Brett W Stringer, Hazel Quek, Zara C Bruce, Amanda Kijas, Valentina Cianfanelli and 16 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. DNA Double-Strand Breaks as Pathogenic Lesions in Neurological Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

Yi Chieh LimCell and Molecular Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer MRI, Queensland, Australia.
Kathleen S EnsbeyCell and Molecular Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer MRI, Queensland, Australia.
Carolin OffenhäuserCell and Molecular Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer MRI, Queensland, Australia.
Rochelle C J D'souzaCell and Molecular Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer MRI, Queensland, Australia.
Jason K CullenCell and Molecular Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer MRI, Queensland, Australia.
Brett W StringerCell and Molecular Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer MRI, Queensland, Australia.
Hazel QuekCell and Molecular Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer MRI, Queensland, Australia.
Zara C BruceCell and Molecular Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer MRI, Queensland, Australia.
Amanda KijasUniversity of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
Valentina CianfanelliCell Stress and Survival Unit, Center for Autophagy, Recycling and Disease (CARD), Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bijan MahboubiDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Fiona SmithCell and Molecular Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer MRI, Queensland, Australia.
Rosalind L JeffreeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Queensland, Australia.
Lisa WiesmüellerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Adrian P WiegmansCell and Molecular Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer MRI, Queensland, Australia.
Amanda BainCell and Molecular Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer MRI, Queensland, Australia.
Fanny J LombardUniversity of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
Tara L RobertsSchool of Medicine, Ingham Institute, New South Wales, Australia.
Kum Kum KhannaCell and Molecular Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer MRI, Queensland, Australia.
Martin F LavinCell and Molecular Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer MRI, Queensland, Australia.
Baek KimCenter for Drug Discovery, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Petra HamerlikBrain Tumor Biology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Terrance G JohnsTelethon Kids Institute, Perth, Australia.
Mark J CosterGriffith Institute for Drug Discovery, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.
Andrew W BoydCell and Molecular Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer MRI, Queensland, Australia.
Bryan W DayCell and Molecular Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer MRI, Queensland, Australia.
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUDanish Cancer Society · DKGriffith University · AUThe University of Queensland · AUChildren's Healthcare of Atlanta · USEmory University · USIngham Institute · AUQueensland University of Technology · AURoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AUThe Kids Research Institute Australia · AUUniversität Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite significant endeavor having been applied to identify effective therapies to treat glioblastoma (GBM), survival outcomes remain intractable. The greatest nonsurgical benefit arises from radiotherapy, though tumors typically recur due to robust DNA repair. Patients could therefore benefit from therapies with the potential to prevent DNA repair and synergize with radiotherapy. In this work, we investigated the potential of salinomycin to enhance radiotherapy and further uncover novel dual functions of this ionophore to induce DNA damage and prevent repair.

methodsIn vitro primary GBM models and ex vivo GBM patient explants were used to determine the mechanism of action of salinomycin by immunoblot, flow cytometry, immunofluorescence, immunohistochemistry, and mass spectrometry. In vivo efficacy studies were performed using orthotopic GBM animal xenograft models. Salinomycin derivatives were synthesized to increase drug efficacy and explore structure-activity relationships.

resultsHere we report novel dual functions of salinomycin. Salinomycin induces toxic DNA lesions and prevents subsequent recovery by targeting homologous recombination (HR) repair. Salinomycin appears to target the more radioresistant GBM stem cell-like population and synergizes with radiotherapy to significantly delay tumor formation in vivo. We further developed salinomycin derivatives which display greater efficacy in vivo while retaining the same beneficial mechanisms of action.

conclusionOur findings highlight the potential of salinomycin to induce DNA lesions and inhibit HR to greatly enhance the effect of radiotherapy. Importantly, first-generation salinomycin derivatives display greater efficacy and may pave the way for clinical testing of these agents.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutophagyBrain NeoplasmsDNA ReplicationDrug DiscoveryGlioblastomaHumansMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDNeoplastic Stem CellsPolyether PolyketidesPyransRecombinational DNA RepairXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysPolyether PolyketidesPyranssalinomycinDNA damagedrug discoveryglioblastomahomologous recombination

Identifiers

PMID31504812
PMCPMC7442340
OpenAlexW2970506816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.