Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31504728›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2019

cis-Cinnamic acid is a natural plant growth-promoting compound.

Ward Steenackers, Ilias El Houari, Alexandra Baekelandt, Klaas Witvrouw, Stijn Dhondt, Olivier Leroux, Nathalie Gonzalez, Sander Corneillie, Igor Cesarino, Dirk Inzé and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Colonization of root endophytic fungusFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Naked Oat andPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Pinoresinol rescues developmental phenotypes of Arabidopsis phenylpropanoid mutants overexpressingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Opposing effects ofPlant direct · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ward SteenackersGhent University, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Gent, Belgium.
Ilias El HouariGhent University, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Gent, Belgium.
Alexandra BaekelandtGhent University, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Gent, Belgium.
Klaas WitvrouwGhent University, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Gent, Belgium.
Stijn DhondtGhent University, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Gent, Belgium.
Olivier LerouxGhent University, Department of Biology, Gent, Belgium.
Nathalie GonzalezGhent University, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Gent, Belgium.
Sander CorneillieGhent University, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Gent, Belgium.
Igor CesarinoGhent University, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Gent, Belgium.
Dirk InzéGhent University, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Gent, Belgium.
Wout BoerjanGhent University, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Gent, Belgium.
Bartel VanholmeGhent University, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Gent, Belgium.
Ghent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agrochemicals provide vast potential to improve plant productivity, because they are easy to implement at low cost while not being restricted by species barriers as compared with breeding strategies. Despite the general interest, only a few compounds with growth-promoting activity have been described so far. Here, we add cis-cinnamic acid (c-CA) to the small portfolio of existing plant growth stimulators. When applied at low micromolar concentrations to Arabidopsis roots, c-CA stimulates both cell division and cell expansion in leaves. Our data support a model explaining the increase in shoot biomass as the consequence of a larger root system, which allows the plant to explore larger areas for resources. The requirement of the cis-configuration for the growth-promoting activity of CA was validated by implementing stable structural analogs of both cis- and trans-CA in this study. In a complementary approach, we used specific light conditions to prevent cis/trans-isomerization of CA during the experiment. In both cases, the cis-form stimulated plant growth, whereas the trans-form was inactive. Based on these data, we conclude that c-CA is an appealing lead compound representing a novel class of growth-promoting agrochemicals. Unraveling the underlying molecular mechanism could lead to the development of innovative strategies for boosting plant biomass.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisCarboxylic AcidsCinnamatesCyclopropanesIndoleacetic AcidsIsomerismNicotianaPlant Development2-phenylcyclopropane-1-carboxylic acidCarboxylic AcidsCinnamatescinnamic acidCyclopropanesIndoleacetic AcidsAgrochemicalauxinbiomassbiostimulantcis-cinnamic acidisomerLEDphenylpropanoidtrans-cinnamic acidUVyield

Identifiers

PMID31504728
PMCPMC6859716
OpenAlexW2970498706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.